![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
I personally think that this is a legit topic. In fact, I thought of starting the thread myself, even though I would never want to sign the guy.
|
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#47 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
I haven't responded to this thread simply because I don't think it's a discussion worth debating. Nothing against Mike Williams or those that want him but I see no benefit of bringing him here or any real reason to defend my stance on it. I just don't think it's a very relevant issue.
So I've just been reading the posts and not responding. And that's the general approach I think many should take. Just keep your mout shut. There is no obligation to respond in every thread. Bad threads (not specifically saying this is one) tend to die out. But since I have responded now, I would just say with all our injuries right now and with Keenan and Reche barely playing (if at all) we shouldn't use an extra body on our rapidly depleting roster for somehow who probably won't have any impact on the roster this season.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
See that, one mod thinks it's worth discussing, another doesn't. And life goes on. Only in America!
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
sorry didn't catch that over the text, dgack
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
Quote:
Carry on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 41
Posts: 937
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
if you watch him play, he's gotta be one of the slowest receivers in (or formerly in) the nfl. That's not what we need.
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
Quote:
It can be tough to keep the two entities seperate, I realize. But the Mike Williams argument seems almost irrelivant, and I'm surprised that the site polarized on this issue so quickly. As for my opinion, I don't really view Mike Williams and Brandon Lloyd any different as players. But if we had brought Lloyd in here for less than a million dollars a season, and signed him as someone else's castoff as opposed to giving 2 picks for him, I'd defend the move to sign him far more often than I do. I don't know where we have the roster room for Mike Williams, but still it seems like a more relevant topic than the next Mike Espy conversation.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
Quote:
I'm just shocked that this Williams issue got ugly fast. I can't think of too many other players in the league that I would like to avoid talking about more.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
We already have 3 well paid wr's that are not producing. Why bring in one that is cheap that won't produce? That's not how The Redskins do business. They would rather over pay and get no production
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
Although this thread should be allowed, I personally feel it very much like that South Park episode about Mormons.
"Dumb Dumb, Dumb Dumb, Dumb!"
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
Since I started this thread, let me say that my interest as a Skins fan is in looking at a draft decision we made in 05 when we selected Rogers. That pick IMO has been overly criticized on this site as I think CR was coming along, really sorry that he got hurt.
I did think for a minute that the skins might look at signing him, but I doubt it due to other needs & the fact that Caldwell & keenan were just brought in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
If I remember correctly allot of people here back when Williams was draft were upset that we did not pick him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
I think Mike Williams if in the correct system could still be a good player. However, I don't think our system is right for him, and we already have a bunch of WRs that we either never use, don't use correctly, or can't catch the ball. If I found out we signed Williams and cut Caldwell, thrash, etc -- I wouldn't be surprised or even really care that much.
__________________
Best. Player. Available. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Mike Williams Cut by Raiders
Speaking of Keenan I wish we would start working him in more. The guy knows how to run a route with the best of them, he can still get open, and he's got good hands. Get him the damn ball already.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|