Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2010, 03:30 PM   #136
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Yeah, regardless of if we go 5 or 6, our receiving corps is suspect at best. Amongst the worst in the league IMO. Cooley and Davis are going to see a lot of targets.
Among worst? Ouch...your WRs are as good as the QB throwing to them. Those beautiful on point bullets that McNabb throws are going to make them look good....real good.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-31-2010, 03:30 PM   #137
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

This discussion of basically fringe WRs is why I will watch some of the Thursday night game this week. It really think that Skins/Cardinals game will be a one game tryout for some of these guys to help Shannahan make his final decisions. I think Banks needs to run some pass routes, catch some balls on offense and not fumble/muff some punts. Devin Thomas needs to catch everything within 5 yards of him! Armstrong is just fun to watch, period! I would love to see him become our number 2 WR!
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:32 PM   #138
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Wouldn't be one bit surprised if Thomas gets cut due to the fact that he stinks.
Not a chance.

He's our second or third best WR.

He hasn't done much this preseason...because he hasn't been put on the field. I really think he's a lock to make it, that's why Shanahan has been featuring Armstrong, Williams, Wade, Austin and Banks in the preseason. He has some tough choices to make at the back end of the WR depth chart. Armstrong has stepped up. But beyond that, there are at least 4 good candidates for the final two spots.

Thomas wasn't even on the field for the Jets game...of course he's been quiet. He's supposed to play a lot for the final game, but I don't see how his roster spot is up in the air.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:47 PM   #139
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buster View Post
Not a chance.

He's our second or third best WR.

He hasn't done much this preseason...because he hasn't been put on the field. I really think he's a lock to make it, that's why Shanahan has been featuring Armstrong, Williams, Wade, Austin and Banks in the preseason. He has some tough choices to make at the back end of the WR depth chart. Armstrong has stepped up. But beyond that, there are at least 4 good candidates for the final two spots.

Thomas wasn't even on the field for the Jets game...of course he's been quiet. He's supposed to play a lot for the final game, but I don't see how his roster spot is up in the air.
I mean you could be right, but I think he is on serious thin ice.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:49 PM   #140
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Thomas is our biggest WR, most physical, and he returns kicks.

I just don't see him getting the axe.

Given the team's patience with Kelly, I would really be surprised to see Thomas get dropped.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:50 PM   #141
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Regarding Kelly's IR...I've gone back and forward over this, but I don't think Devin Thomas is going to make the team. Brandon Banks gets that spot, at least temporarily. Kelly kept (stupidly, I might add) pushing himself to get back out on the practice field when he simply couldn't go, so the ability to IR Kelly and tell the kid to not get worked up over preparing week to week this season and to just be healthy for OTA's, that could save his career in Washington.

Or not. He might just get hurt again and waste everyones time.
I think that he'll make the team, Thomas that is.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:52 PM   #142
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Seems like only yesterday many of us were ready to push Moss, Portis, and Rogers aside and move on without them...and now they're back to being integral parts of the team
It sure looks that way and if Moss can carry this over to the regular season he should have a very good year. I still think JC was a bigger part of the problem then people think. I'm guessing they have seen something in Kelly to keep him here. So I guess that kind of good news.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:52 PM   #143
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Banks wouldn't make it "over" Thomas. Thomas would be cut to free up the roster spot, then they'd probably play the waiver wire. Banks, if he's not the starting punt returner, probably gets passed through to practice squad after dodging a round of waiver pickups.

LaCanfora mentioned Andre Davis as a guy Kyle Shanahan might be into in order to shore up this gaping hole on our roster.
Yeah I read that from JLC.. if they pick Davis over Thomas I really don't know what to say...
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:53 PM   #144
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Thomas is our biggest WR, most physical, and he returns kicks.

I just don't see him getting the axe.

Given the team's patience with Kelly, I would really be surprised to see Thomas get dropped.

Devin Thomas is terrible at returning kicks. Why do people think he is in line for that job?

I do think his blocking on the punt return team is what stands out most favorably.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:54 PM   #145
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Thomas is our biggest WR, most physical, and he returns kicks.

I just don't see him getting the axe.

Given the team's patience with Kelly, I would really be surprised to see Thomas get dropped.
Like him on special teams as much as the next guy, but it's not good when a really on the bubble guy can't even get on the field.

Kelly, I think, would have been a very easy cut -- it's not like he has a great shot to make the team next year. But if Shanny already knows Thomas is gone, it makes more sense to not dump Kelly at the same time.

With that said, every spot is open after Moss and Armstrong. Still skeptical that Galloway or Wade or Roydell Williams have a chance to make it, but this team does have more invested in both Banks and Austin than Thomas. I think that's a really bad sign for Thomas, especially now that we know Kelly is going to open next offseason with the team.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:54 PM   #146
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtMonkDrillz View Post
Is that from this year? Do the vets STILL make MK carry their helmets?
the other helmet is for his knee
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:57 PM   #147
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Devin Thomas is terrible at returning kicks. Why do people think he is in line for that job?

I do think his blocking on the punt return team is what stands out most favorably.
Terrible? I'd say average
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:00 PM   #148
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Devin Thomas is terrible at returning kicks. Why do people think he is in line for that job?

I do think his blocking on the punt return team is what stands out most favorably.
Because he's been listed on the depth chart as the main KR since camp opened. He's certainly in the mix.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:20 PM   #149
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Among worst? Ouch...your WRs are as good as the QB throwing to them. Those beautiful on point bullets that McNabb throws are going to make them look good....real good.
Not sure if you're being sarcastic here or not. Assuming you're not... point on bullets from McNabb? He's notorious for throwing at receivers' feet. Or behind them. However, McNabb has had good seasons with guys like Reggie Brown, Todd Pinkston, and Freddie Mitchell. But that was also with Brian Westbrook in his prime. Yes, I think right now on paper we've got one of the worst receiving corps in the league. How many teams in the league would have Santana Moss as their #1? Ick.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:57 PM   #150
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Update: Malcolm Kelly To Be Placed On IR

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Not sure if you're being sarcastic here or not. Assuming you're not... point on bullets from McNabb? He's notorious for throwing at receivers' feet. Or behind them. However, McNabb has had good seasons with guys like Reggie Brown, Todd Pinkston, and Freddie Mitchell. But that was also with Brian Westbrook in his prime. Yes, I think right now on paper we've got one of the worst receiving corps in the league. How many teams in the league would have Santana Moss as their #1? Ick.
I am not being sarcastic at all...McNabb can throw the deep ball, the out route, fade, the hook, the slat, etc. No more waiting on the QB to throw the damn ball as soon as the WR makes a cut. Sure, he's no Payton Manning but he's better than 90% of the QBs in the league...and the fact that he threw 70% and he had such shitty receivers gives me hope that him and our receivers are going to have a magical year. We'll know soon enough.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.99220 seconds with 12 queries