Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


(Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2010, 05:33 PM   #106
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

I'm going to guess that the gameplan was a bit scaled down for McNabb last night and that's probably why he didn't spread it around. As he gets more comfortable I think he will get more guys involved.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-13-2010, 05:35 PM   #107
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
What the hell was he yelling. "Hey ass holes see we didn't even need that f***ing touchdown I dropped".
It's only funny because we won.

Sundberg could have yelled something similar.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 05:42 PM   #108
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

I did not realize how well that ball was thrown until I just saw the pic in the above link. I hope it was just his nerves and this is not the start of any trend.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 05:54 PM   #109
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

The first fade to Armstrong was right on the money, he just flat out dropped it. The 2nd was better defended, but the pass was still right there.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 05:56 PM   #110
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

We should put in Thomas if for nothing more then the fact that he's among the better blockers playing receiver.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 05:57 PM   #111
diehard
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Prediction: Thomas will play ahead of Armstrong against HOU.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 06:07 PM   #112
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

You know who I really didn't see much of last night? Fred Davis.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 06:11 PM   #113
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by diehard View Post
Prediction: Thomas will play ahead of Armstrong against HOU.
I don't know. I think that Armstrong will still be ahead of Thomas. In spite of last nights miscue the guy is still closer to breaking out.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I'm going to guess that the gameplan was a bit scaled down for McNabb last night and that's probably why he didn't spread it around. As he gets more comfortable I think he will get more guys involved.
I pray you're right.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 06:15 PM   #114
redskin37
Special Teams
 
redskin37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oneida N.Y
Posts: 138
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Joey Galloway will be benched and or cut by week 4. How he is staring is crazy.
redskin37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 06:43 PM   #115
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
You know who I really didn't see much of last night? Fred Davis.
He got in briefly on a couple of plays, got a penalty for holding and I didn't see much of him after that.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 10:35 PM   #116
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

So, did Bruce Allen call A.J. Smith today?
theJBexperience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 10:44 PM   #117
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
I don't know. I think that Armstrong will still be ahead of Thomas. In spite of last nights miscue the guy is still closer to breaking out.




I pray you're right.
Not sure about Armstrong more close in breaking out than DT. I know it is one game, but so far, he doesn't look like he is going anywhere. I am thinking WR will be a top priority in the draft or the next FA signing period, or both. I love our TE's but you can't always target them.
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 01:03 AM   #118
KI Skins Fan
Pro Bowl
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,398
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by theJBexperience View Post
So, did Bruce Allen call A.J. Smith today?
He should have.
KI Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 01:26 AM   #119
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
My thought exactly. As long as we have invisible WR's we should be getting Cooley and Davis on the field and catching balls at the same time. I'm not sure why that didn't happen last night.
Word. It's a glaring "mystery." Davis is nearly as agile as a WR and arguably has better hands than any (WR) on the roster. Throw him in the slot and Cooley at TE.

I agree w/ those who think Thomas should get his reps out there. He's still got the most potential of any WR on the roster. Maybe the Shanny's are working him in easy, which would make sense considering it's the elephant in the room (how much pressure/expectation there is for him).
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2010, 09:25 AM   #120
SportsFanatic
Camp Scrub
 
SportsFanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!

The main thing Mcnabb did on Snday night that impressed me was keeping drives alive and not turning the ball over. I'm sure the TD's will come as we move forward in the season.
SportsFanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.17220 seconds with 12 queries