|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-22-2005, 10:04 PM | #31 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Should We Punt Groom?
The boy's a rookie! I think he'll be fine after awhile. It's the coverage that I am concerned with.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
Advertisements |
09-22-2005, 10:57 PM | #32 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: Should We Punt Groom?
I believe that Bennet played Australian Rules Football (footy as they refer to it there) not rugby.
I think Groom has been satisfactory as a punter. I don't think I'd go out and spend whatever small cap sapce the team has left this year to replace him with another punter who would almost have to cost more than Groom.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
09-22-2005, 11:58 PM | #33 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
|
Re: Should We Punt Groom?
Considering the circumstances, the fact that Groom has stepped in and (a) not shanked anything (as far as I remember), (b) pinned people down within their 20 from time to time, and (c) done a couple of coffin corners to prevent significant runbacks, has shown that he's been worth the investment so far.
Personally, I like him. Nice high kicks that lets our coverage unit (especially James Thrash) get down and get the job done. Before the end of the season, we'll probably see more punts within the 15, 10, and even 5 yard lines. |
09-25-2005, 01:51 AM | #34 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Should We Punt Groom?
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
09-25-2005, 08:36 AM | #35 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Should We Punt Groom?
Quote:
|
|
|
|