Redskins-Chiefs Game Thread 10/16/05

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 10-16-2005, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bozzy

Brunell fucking sucks. Max protect is nothing.

Why do you say Brunell sucks? I can't really blame him for the first fumble. Granted, he should have been more careful with the ball when he fumbled the second time around. But, he didn't throw any picks and he threw for over 300 yards and 3 touchdowns. What more could you ask for? Not much.

Bozzy · 10-16-2005, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramseyfan

Why do you say Brunell sucks? I can't really blame him for the first fumble. Granted, he should have been more careful with the ball when he fumbled the second time around. But, he didn't throw any picks and he threw for over 300 yards and 3 touchdowns. What more could you ask for? Not much.

Both fumbles were his fault. And he should know how to keep the ball close to his body when he scrambles. A veteran QB should know that.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 10-16-2005, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bozzy

Both fumbles were his fault. And he should know how to keep the ball close to his body when he scrambles. A veteran QB should know that.

He wasn't scrambling when he fumbled the first time around, Samuels just got beat.

To be upset with him for the fumbles is certainly understandable. But to say Brunell sucks and to put the loss on him is going a little too far. Brunell did just fine in my opinion.

skins052bgr8 · 10-16-2005, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bozzy

Both fumbles were his fault. And he should know how to keep the ball close to his body when he scrambles. A veteran QB should know that.

You've got to be kidding me it is not the offense that is killing us this year, or I should say Brunell. Did you forget the long TD again the D gave up on a ugly screen and Cartwright putting up a fumble that D got 7. the 1 fumble was his problem. That Damn D end for KC ate our O lines lunch and wreaked havoc that hurt us.

ST21 · 10-16-2005, 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gmanc711

We passed for 330 yards and 3 Tds. What else do we want? We need to stop the turnover and play some freaking defense.

thats got damn right!!!!!!!!!!!!

MTK · 10-16-2005, 07:48 PM

Whoever is blaming Brunell for the loss either didn't see the game or is just ignorant.

His fumbles didn't help, but the guy is playing his ass off, we would be lost without him.

skinsguy · 10-16-2005, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bozzy

Both fumbles were his fault. And he should know how to keep the ball close to his body when he scrambles. A veteran QB should know that.

I disagree. The first one wasn't his fault. Samething would have happened to Tom Brady. The second one was his fault, but at least he was trying to make a play for us, other than Patrick Ramsey throwing the ball up for grabs.

BigSKINBauer · 10-16-2005, 08:58 PM

i love santana, without santana we would be 0-5, literally i am not joking

railcon56 · 10-16-2005, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramseyfan

He wasn't scrambling when he fumbled the first time around, Samuels just got beat.

To be upset with him for the fumbles is certainly understandable. But to say Brunell sucks and to put the loss on him is going a little too far. Brunell did just fine in my opinion.

I am a Ramsey fan and thought he got a raw deal..and have been very outspoken against brunell...BUT this one wasnt on him i thought he played great ..i will not put him down for trying to make a play... he played his heart out.... He has earned my respect.....

GoSkins! · 10-16-2005, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LongTimeSkinsFan

Plain and simple, I was not impressed with the defense today. Granted, we are missing Springs and unfortunately Ade Jimoh has to play than any of us want him to and Carlos Rodgers will be the target of many QBs testing his skills and he'll get burned his fair share, but...

1) No Pressure on the QB + 2) No Turnovers + 3) 3 Fumbles of our own = a loss

I agree with 1, 2, and 3. But I was pretty impressed with the way the defense kept KC from really running away with this game. I can assure you that if we had the three turnovers, we would have won that game big. Some of the problem is the defense, but some of the problem is that we need to jump out to a lead so that other offenses can't play so close to the vest.

GoSkins! · 10-16-2005, 09:24 PM

BTW, Brunnel doesn't suck. The guy is running the offense about as good as I've ever seen. We will all feel better once we beat up on San Fran.

PHEWWWW!

10-16-2005, 07:48 PM	#51
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,050	Re: Redskins-Chiefs Game Thread 10/16/05 Whoever is blaming Brunell for the loss either didn't see the game or is just ignorant. His fumbles didn't help, but the guy is playing his ass off, we would be lost without him.

10-16-2005, 08:58 PM	#53
BigSKINBauer Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Washington, DC Age: 38 Posts: 5,688	Re: Redskins-Chiefs Game Thread 10/16/05 i love santana, without santana we would be 0-5, literally i am not joking

10-16-2005, 09:24 PM	#56
GoSkins! The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Yorktown, Va Age: 57 Posts: 1,587	Re: Redskins-Chiefs Game Thread 10/16/05 BTW, Brunnel doesn't suck. The guy is running the offense about as good as I've ever seen. We will all feel better once we beat up on San Fran. PHEWWWW! __________________ Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien

Redskins-Chiefs Game Thread 10/16/05

Locker Room Main Forum