Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


2007 Opponents

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2007, 04:14 PM   #16
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: 2007 Opponents

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Zimmermans View Post
Our schedule this year was a joke, and we went 5-11. In the nfc, 5-11 is pretty bad. I wonder what our record would have been in the AFC, actually I don't wanna know.
Well we were 2-2 against the AFC this year, so a .500 record. Over the course of the season that would be 8-8. 8-8 record this year and we could have been talking playoffs baby!!!....sigh
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-02-2007, 04:19 PM   #17
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
Re: 2007 Opponents

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Our schedule wasn't a joke. It was harder than the average NFL schedule. Our opponents' winning percentage was .512.
And remember last year when we saw our opponents, we were instantly marking the Vikings and Titans down as wins while Jacksonville was most likely a loss?
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 04:32 PM   #18
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,422
Re: 2007 Opponents

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection View Post
And remember last year when we saw our opponents, we were instantly marking the Vikings and Titans down as wins while Jacksonville was most likely a loss?
Yeah. And we were thinking the Saints would be an easy win, until we actually were heading into that game thinking we had no chance, and we ended up pulling it out.

Just when you think you know how it's going to play out, it all goes Flipmode on your ass.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 04:38 PM   #19
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
Re: 2007 Opponents

I like this schedule on paper. The NFC North only has one above average team (Chicago), and Portis ran all over their vaunted defense in both 2004 and 2005 meetings. The Patriots are the one AFC team that scares me of that bunch. Then again who thought in their wildest dreams that this year's team would lose 11 games.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 04:49 PM   #20
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
Re: 2007 Opponents

So therefore, I take nothing into what the schedule is going to look like. I BETCHA' ARZ looks at the top linemen in the draft. Look what the Jets did when they got the best center and tackle in the draft.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 05:04 PM   #21
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: 2007 Opponents

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post

Work and deserve it, earn it to own it (that's got new signature written all over it).
man, now tafkas doesnt even have to work. you do it all for him
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 05:32 PM   #22
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 59
Posts: 594
Re: 2007 Opponents

I wonder if fans of the Bucs and other last place teams are saying, "Sweet! We get to play the last-place Redskins next season!"
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way.
Twilbert07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 06:00 PM   #23
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: 2007 Opponents

The Bucs are the only team on that schedule that don't scare me. I'm not impressed with any of their QBs or wideouts.

There defense is about as good as ours. I think Monte Kiffen is a better DC than Williams. That's how they've maintained a decent defense year and year out, but they are aging too.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 06:08 PM   #24
Redskinhog1963
Special Teams
 
Redskinhog1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: somewhere on this planet
Age: 61
Posts: 178
Unhappy Re: 2007 Opponents

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
Is it just me or does it feel like we always play the Bucs?
and it alwats seems we have to play them in tampa,and the rackers in green bay skins als have to play the pats and jets away,that pisses me off!
__________________
Parcells' legacy with the Cowboys can be framed this way: Instead of joining Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer as coaches who led them to championships, he leaves lumped with Chan Gailey and Dave Campo.
(ESPN QUOTE)
Redskinhog1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 06:11 PM   #25
Redskinhog1963
Special Teams
 
Redskinhog1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: somewhere on this planet
Age: 61
Posts: 178
Re: 2007 Opponents

redskins need a mlb and a defensive end in the worst way!anyone think they'll go after gonzales the TE from the cheiefs?i'd like to see them go after
another wr,and replace givens!
__________________
Parcells' legacy with the Cowboys can be framed this way: Instead of joining Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer as coaches who led them to championships, he leaves lumped with Chan Gailey and Dave Campo.
(ESPN QUOTE)
Redskinhog1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 06:18 PM   #26
ncskinsfanec
Special Teams
 
ncskinsfanec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 432
Re: 2007 Opponents

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection View Post
Great, we get Tampa to be able to beat us again. And why must we ALWAYS play them DOWN THERE.

I wonder how Cadillac was able to run on us this time even without a better QB in Simms.

Something also is telling me ARZ will be improved next year. James with that receiver corps is no joke. They just need someone to make it work.
I believe we beat Tampa in the playoffs last year, did we not? The game was also in Tampa too. People sure do have short memories in this discussion board.
ncskinsfanec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2007, 06:22 PM   #27
ncskinsfanec
Special Teams
 
ncskinsfanec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 432
Re: 2007 Opponents

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskinhog1963 View Post
redskins need a mlb and a defensive end in the worst way!anyone think they'll go after gonzales the TE from the cheiefs?i'd like to see them go after
another wr,and replace givens!
Replace Givens? What on earth are you talking about? Do you mean Lloyd? We won't go after Gonzales because we already have a top notch tight end.
ncskinsfanec is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.31602 seconds with 12 queries