|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal? | |||
Lose out on chance to take one of the top players at #6 | 37 | 27.21% | |
Lose out on chance to trade down for more picks | 63 | 46.32% | |
Briggs doesn't fill a crucial need | 83 | 61.03% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-30-2007, 11:11 AM | #31 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
simply put, he takes up too much cap space. I dont feel comfortable paying any defensive player that much money, the only 2 positions I do are QB and LT. Look at the Pats, they dont sign huge long term contracts with big bonuses, and they are considered to be the top contender next year because they are solid at every position.
|
Advertisements |
03-30-2007, 11:12 AM | #32 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,422
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Quote:
Jamarcus Russell is loved because he's huge and has a cannon arm Calvin Johnson is loved for obvious reasons Joe Thomas is thought to be the only franchise T in the draft Brady Quinn looks real good to QB-hungry teams Adrian Peterson has crazy RB talent Given the needs of the teams in the top 5, there's a good chance one of those guys falls to 6. I think people are assuming one of them will be there for us, and that someone will want them. I think chances are, we'll be fielding a couple offers.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
03-30-2007, 11:14 AM | #33 | |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Quote:
Unless the deal is UNBELIEVABLE, we wait until were on the clock! This deal is not.............that
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
|
03-30-2007, 11:24 AM | #34 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Quote:
Overall, we're not in great shape at #6 because most teams will know we're not seriously interested in these guys, or teams interested in these guys will want to move up higher than 6. If CJ were to fall, maybe we'd take him, but that's unlikely he'd slip to 6. Now that Denver signed Bly, they may not be in the running for the 6 pick. Houston might be a possibility, but to move up 2 spots we're not going to get a lot of picks from them. We'd be lucky to get a 2nd. |
|
03-30-2007, 11:25 AM | #35 |
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
At first I did not like this deal, but after I thought about it I did not hate it as bad. We would have a pro bowl linebacker, behind Carter and it might solidify that side against the run. It would also free Carter up to rush the passer more. For them to make this deal, I think we should insist that they take Rocky and give us a second rounder. If we don't we will destroy him anyway.
|
03-30-2007, 11:41 AM | #36 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
MY biggest gripe is another Briggs thread about the same stuff.LOl
|
03-30-2007, 11:47 AM | #37 |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
My biggest gripe is that there is so much u can do with that 6th pick I can't understand why someone in their right mind would trade it a month before draft day! For a F@#%ing big name player who most likely will not fit in our system. Just let me be the gm for one season, I'd have a championship team. This IS SO FRUSTRATING, I might pickett in front of Redskins Park... Anyone with me?
__________________
That got ugly fast |
03-30-2007, 11:54 AM | #38 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 3,813
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Briggs doesn't come close to filling a real need and unlike CJ, if he were brought in, wouldn't make the big plays as often to warrant the cost of his contract. Plus if it were to go through, I don't think it's unfair, but maybe stretching it a bit, to say that Rocky was one of the most wasteful use of trading multiple picks for one pick since ricky williams. He barely saw the field last year yet when he did he was making plays, but despite that they r willing to give up our high 1st and a contract equaling almost as much as Washington's and Fletcher's contracts combined for a player that has been very productive but so far only in a very different type of defensive set. If Briggs were a DE this would definitely be worth it, but as it stands LB is already the defense's strongest group.
For once the Skins actually have some bargaining power with their first round pick and that pick could carry a lot of value come draft day if one of a couple players falls to them so I hope they atleast wait until draft day to make a trade decision.
__________________
"Ahhh, so you're stupid in 3 languages?" |
03-30-2007, 11:56 AM | #39 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Quote:
*AMD is not responsible for any riots that actually occur at the Redskins Darft Day party.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
03-30-2007, 11:58 AM | #40 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Quote:
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
03-30-2007, 12:02 PM | #41 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Quote:
Carter getting pushed around by 50 year old Bob Whitfield. Carter needs to be only playing on passing downs. But that's another whole nother subject. |
|
03-30-2007, 12:05 PM | #42 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
What about Rocky? Honestly, that's my only true concern. The dollars aren't really an issue and if Bly can get $18 million guaranteed then Briggs can get $20 million. And I think this draft is deep enough on the line that we can still get help at #31
But, we moved up to draft Rocky and then spent money on Fletch. So what's the plan with them? Is Rocky already on the outs? Is he being groomed as the heir apparent at MLB? Is this part of GWill's "everyone's a starter philosophy"
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
03-30-2007, 12:07 PM | #43 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,281
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Quote:
|
|
03-30-2007, 12:32 PM | #44 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Laurel
Age: 64
Posts: 9
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Exactly true. But, while picking at #6 statistically might have better odds of picking a winner, that too is no guarantee.
My thinking says trading down has two distinct advantages: 1. Several positions of need. Leaving the gap (in pick chances) open from the #6 pick until their next pick in Round 5 doesn't help fill those positions of need. 2. Risk averaging. By getting several, albeit lower, picks, the cost of the risk incurred is spread out over those several picks. With one selection at 6 (or 31 if it comes to pass), #6 becomes an all-or-nothing choice. To have the holes we have, and then potentially select a DUD at 6 means another wasted draft opportunity. |
03-30-2007, 12:37 PM | #45 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: What is your main gripe with the proposed Briggs deal?
Quote:
Someone obviously had high hopes for Rocky last year... so did we really whiff that badly on him or is this simply another case of this FO falling in love with a big name FA? |
|
|
|