Should Ramsey Start Against Chicago?

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 10-11-2004, 12:23 AM

Has Brunell done enough to justify starting?

VTSkins897 · 10-11-2004, 12:24 AM

nobody on the offense has

illdefined · 10-11-2004, 12:27 AM

well, Ramsey's the qb of the future, lets start grooming Ramsey now.

Redskins_P · 10-11-2004, 12:27 AM

I say start Ramsey......we need a change

RedskinRat · 10-11-2004, 12:30 AM

I said this last week, start Ramsey.

Brunell hasn't looked comfortable in any games so far, he misses open receivers and is far too quick in throwing the ball instead of scrambling, hammy or not.

jdlea · 10-11-2004, 12:30 AM

How long have I been saying that?

Where is all of the blame for Coles or the O Line? Where is everyone rushing to Brunell's defense this week? I want to know? What finally made it hit home that he sucks? Someone tell me because I've been telling you he was no good since we played Dallas.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 10-11-2004, 12:30 AM

And the tide is turning.

As I said last week, Ramsey is our future and Brunell should be the guy to tutor him. Brunell is the savy veteran who can help Ramsey see what he hasn't been able to.

Brunell had about a 40% completion percentage, threw for less than 100 yards, refuses to eat a hit for a completion, and has led us to 1-4. WHAT exactly does he need to do to get benched?

Ramsey isn't perfect, Ramsey isn't going to be our savior (this season), but he'll move the ball.

redrock-skins · 10-11-2004, 12:32 AM

I would be against it a week ago, but now it should be given consideration. I still think a lot of you forget Ramsey's performance against the Giants. However, Gibbs likes to throw the longball and Ramsey does have a better arm. Ramsey will not be able to save this season though.

hurrykaine · 10-11-2004, 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramseyfan

Has Brunell done enough to justify starting?

I think before we experiment with a new QB, we ought to experiment at starting right tackle...maybe Mark Wilson over Kenyatta and Ray. Too many tackles for loss and turnovers when we're attacked from the right side of the line.

I say use the Chicago game as the litmus test for QB. If Brunell can't do anything against the Bears, its time to sit him. Its not like we're rushing to the playoffs this year, or anything.

drew54 · 10-11-2004, 12:32 AM

:vomit-smi Brunell, Bring in Ramsey

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 10-11-2004, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hurrykaine

I think before we experiment with a new QB, we ought to experiment at starting right tackle...maybe Mark Wilson over Kenyatta and Ray. Too many tackles for loss and turnovers when we're attacked from the right side of the line.

I say use the Chicago game as the litmus test for QB. If Brunell can't do anything against the Bears, its time to sit him. Its not like we're rushing to the playoffs this year, or anything.

That's a good point, but I still respectfully disagree. If this guy's name wasn't Brunell his butt would've been yanked by now.

MTK · 10-11-2004, 12:34 AM

Maybe it is time for a change, but I'm still not going to pin all the blame on Brunell.

Alot of other guys are struggling right along with him, the entire offense is sputtering, it's not just Brunell.

I don't know if Ramsey would make much of a difference.

Might as well toss him in there so he stink up the joint and we can call for his head and beg for Hasslebeck.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 10-11-2004, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redrock-skins

I would be against it a week ago, but now it should be given consideration. I still think a lot of you forget Ramsey's performance against the Giants. However, Gibbs likes to throw the longball and Ramsey does have a better arm. Ramsey will not be able to save this season though.

I haven't forgotten Ramsey's performance against the G-men.

But, I haven't forgotten Brunell's performance in Week 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

illdefined · 10-11-2004, 12:35 AM

Brunell is NOT the one thing "off" with this offense. do not get it twisted. Ramsey has a TON to learn, and can stink up the joint just as bad if not worse. but since he's the qb of the future, i say get all out of him now. we have nothing to lose at this point.

VTSkins897 · 10-11-2004, 12:35 AM

seems to me that this season is already done. so like they're saying, why not get ramsey for next year.?

View Poll Results: Should Brunell start next week?
Are you crazy, keep Brunell in!	5	5.56%
Brunell hasn't done much, but enough to remain the starter.	19	21.11%
Brunell isn't a bad QB, but we'd be better with Ramsey.	30	33.33%
Are you crazy, it's not even a question...start Ramsey!	36	40.00%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

10-11-2004, 12:23 AM	#1
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 45 Posts: 8,317	Should Ramsey Start Against Chicago? Has Brunell done enough to justify starting?

10-11-2004, 12:24 AM	#2
VTSkins897 Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Richmond, VA Age: 41 Posts: 890	nobody on the offense has

10-11-2004, 12:27 AM	#3
illdefined Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: nyc Age: 48 Posts: 2,631	well, Ramsey's the qb of the future, lets start grooming Ramsey now.

10-11-2004, 12:27 AM	#4
Redskins_P Fight for old DC! Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Aldie, VA Age: 46 Posts: 4,101	I say start Ramsey......we need a change

10-11-2004, 12:30 AM	#5
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	I said this last week, start Ramsey. Brunell hasn't looked comfortable in any games so far, he misses open receivers and is far too quick in throwing the ball instead of scrambling, hammy or not.

10-11-2004, 12:30 AM	#6
jdlea Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, VA Age: 40 Posts: 3,109	How long have I been saying that? Where is all of the blame for Coles or the O Line? Where is everyone rushing to Brunell's defense this week? I want to know? What finally made it hit home that he sucks? Someone tell me because I've been telling you he was no good since we played Dallas.

10-11-2004, 12:32 AM	#8
redrock-skins Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Seattle Posts: 783	I would be against it a week ago, but now it should be given consideration. I still think a lot of you forget Ramsey's performance against the Giants. However, Gibbs likes to throw the longball and Ramsey does have a better arm. Ramsey will not be able to save this season though.

10-11-2004, 12:32 AM	#10
drew54 The Starter Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: IOWA Age: 42 Posts: 1,324	:vomit-smi Brunell, Bring in Ramsey

10-11-2004, 12:34 AM	#12
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 52 Posts: 99,518	Maybe it is time for a change, but I'm still not going to pin all the blame on Brunell. Alot of other guys are struggling right along with him, the entire offense is sputtering, it's not just Brunell. I don't know if Ramsey would make much of a difference. Might as well toss him in there so he stink up the joint and we can call for his head and beg for Hasslebeck.

10-11-2004, 12:35 AM	#14
illdefined Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: nyc Age: 48 Posts: 2,631	Brunell is NOT the one thing "off" with this offense. do not get it twisted. Ramsey has a TON to learn, and can stink up the joint just as bad if not worse. but since he's the qb of the future, i say get all out of him now. we have nothing to lose at this point.

Should Ramsey Start Against Chicago?

Locker Room Main Forum