|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-12-2004, 02:37 PM | #16 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Portis has no 'pop' in his running. Even the few times he seems to break into somewhat open field it seems as if he does not know what to do or where to cut. He just does not seem like the back the redskins thought they were getting when the traded for him.
|
Advertisements |
10-12-2004, 02:54 PM | #17 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
10-12-2004, 02:59 PM | #18 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
10-12-2004, 02:59 PM | #19 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
The way I look at it is if Brunell and Portis are struggling then theres only one person (or should I say group) to blame and that's the o-line. Portis can't run because he has no holes. Brunell sometimes doesn't have the time to throw downfield. Without the o-line clicking then you can forget about the whole offense. It all starts up front.
That being said, if the offense continues to struggle then I wouldn't be surprised if they do bench Brunell. But there is no way Brunell takes all the blame for Portis not being able to run the ball consistently. |
10-12-2004, 03:41 PM | #20 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Once Portis stops thinking so much and just starts running he'll be fine.
|
10-12-2004, 03:51 PM | #21 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Matty:
Don't be too frustrated with this thread. There is a glimmer of hope. At least we don't have anyone - as yet - calling for Sultan to replace Clinton based on the showings in exhibition games and/or for Gibran Hamden to return to town to save the season based on his sterling performances in NFL Europe last spring. Remember, it is always darkest just before the lights go out completely...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
10-12-2004, 03:59 PM | #22 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
And the light at the end of the tunnel is an express train heading your way.........
|
10-12-2004, 04:08 PM | #23 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: silver spring
Age: 39
Posts: 486
|
im not sure the line is the problem. there is very simply to many people in the box to block because there is no threat down the field
|
10-12-2004, 04:10 PM | #24 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
SC:
We have had a few posts calling for McCullough. I think it's Sunra that's the Sultan fan. None for Hamdan, but positive for Hasselbeck. |
10-12-2004, 04:59 PM | #25 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
How can they put 8 men in the box if their double covering 2 wr's, as well we alway's have either a TE, or back, running a pattern, so I do not believe that can be correct, as for Brunell's number's in the cowboy game, he made 1 nice throw for a TD, and guess what, he scrabled to do it, but it was defiently a nice play on his part, but even a broken clock is right twice a day, as far as the bulk of his yardage, it came on 2 throw's to Gardner, jump ball's, throwing a ball up for grab's is not a high percentage pass, and dangerous, those were desperation throw's, point out a nice deep ball he has thrown, if he threw that pass a little further last game, he could have hit coles for a TD instead of an INT to Deion, as it was he had coles turning the wrong way, Ramsey completed as many deep ball's in 2 quarter's, as brunell has in 4 1/2 games. I agree that Gibb's is partly resposible for the passing problem's, he is the one starting Brunell. |
|
10-12-2004, 07:35 PM | #26 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 506
|
Guys, I hate to say it, but I don't see Brunell sitting down anytime soon.
I think Gibbs likes the fact that he throws the ball away and doesn't try to fit it into double-coverage. The crux of the problem is that teams are loading up to stop the run and playing tight coverage. Brunell just doesn't have the arm to make them pay downfield, nor do I think he has the mentality. He would be perfect if we were somehow running effectively because he would be able to get better opportunities via play-action, but things just aren't clicking right now. Sometimes, a change at QB can be great, but they just aren't ready to take that chance yet. Unfortunately. |
10-12-2004, 07:56 PM | #27 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
He's got the fewest yards per pass attempt in the NFC and the fewest deep balls in the entire league. That's not someone who's succeeding at throwing a deep ball. |
|
10-12-2004, 08:05 PM | #28 |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
5.6 Yards per pass is pretty much the only number I need to see. That is freaking rediculous. 5.6 yards per pass?????
__________________
#21 |
10-12-2004, 09:19 PM | #29 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Quote:
DR I think you hit on the head, Brunell does not have the mentality to get the ball downfield, he never learned how to be a pocket passer, which mean's you really have to be able to read a defense, his deep ball's in jax. were a lot of times, broken play's. |
|
10-12-2004, 10:56 PM | #30 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|