|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-26-2008, 01:16 PM | #1 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
|
Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Alright I'm going to toss my hat in the ring and toss out this theory as to what the plan is.
With Gibbs out of the picture, the nice and easy solution would have been to retain Williams as HC and leave the rest of the staff relatively intact. Here's the hitch though, this staff was Joe Gibbs' staff. He put it together and let's face it, it wasn't exactly a staff built for the long term. I'm not sure of the average age of the staff, but it's got to be right at the top for one of the oldest, errr, I mean experienced staffs in the league. Again, not a staff built for the long term and not one that was picked by Williams. So what I'm saying is, even if Williams took over, there was going to be some pretty significant changes. Saunders was probably outta here no matter what, and guys like Breaux and Burns weren't going to stick around with Gibbs out of the picture. You promote GW, you need a new DC, so that's another open spot on the staff. A few other coach's have contracts that are up, so who knows if they would have been retained as well. There have always been rumblings that Williams and Snyder weren't exactly best buddies the past few years, and Gibbs was the buffer between the two. Just look at Williams' style. Tough guy, disciplinarian, on the arrogant side, sound familiar? Sounds a little like another coach that Snyder didn't play nice with... Marty Schottenheimer. In summary, Williams and Snyder probably weren't going to last in the long run. Eventually their egos would have clashed (probably sooner rather than later), and then where would that have left things? In search of another new HC and more turmoil? If you ask me, if Snyder has any doubt about working with Williams for the long run, the right move is to not even try to go there. Cut the head off this thing now and move on rather than trying to avoid the inevitable. He tried this once with Marty and we all know how that worked out. He doesn't want to go down that road again. So ultimately I think the plan is to put together a staff for the long run. If that means taking a step backwards now in order to take steps ahead in the future, this is what has to be done. It certainly isn't pretty, but it seems like this is what needs to happen in order for Snyder to have a staff in place that he is comfortable with going forward with. I have to say that I already like the Zorn hiring, and before you jump all over this notion that why did they hire an OC without having a HC first, let's just point out that Dallas did the same exact thing last year when they hired Garrett before Phillips. Zorn was reportedly high on the lists of all the potential HC's, so it was a no-brainer. I think we're going to see some more quality hirings too and in the end once the dust settles we just might like the looks of the new staff. Give it some more time, stay patient, and let's judge the entire package once everything is in place. Did anyone see the Zorn hiring coming a few weeks ago? I sure didn't. That tells me that someone is doing their homework in this search to turn up quality assistants and they're not just shooting for the big names. Look at some of the other names that have been floated out there. Schwartz, Meeks, Spagnola... not exactly the sexy big names that we always blame Snyder for going after. Feel free to agree or disagree, but let's just keep things civil. There seems to be this notion that the moderators here don't want to hear any dissenting opinions. That's simply not true, what we're looking for is less emotional over the top stuff and more civil rational discussion. Fire away. |
Advertisements |
01-26-2008, 01:19 PM | #2 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Hog Heaven | MVN - Most Valuable Network » Blog Archive » The Great Counter Argument
I wrote that last night, but a lot of the points you are making are very similar to mine.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
01-26-2008, 01:20 PM | #3 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,576
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Quote:
|
|
01-26-2008, 01:27 PM | #4 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Fayetteville, NC
Age: 39
Posts: 896
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Well, Williams himself wasn't exactly ancient...but I see what you're saying. I guess my problems lie more in the process than in the actual hiring. Time will tell how the players react and how the fans accept the adjustments.
|
01-26-2008, 01:29 PM | #5 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
The process itself, initially, was very thorough. It sure seems like some mistakes have been made of recent though, especially with the alleged contract offering/pulling due to Rex Ryan's disinterest.
Anyway, I think Matty's post best illustrates the way that most people would have wanted us to go with the coaching search three months ago. Since then, a lot of people have become attached to the idea of Gregg Williams at HC. I hope that if Williams officially pulls his name today, people will take it as a sign that this decision was mutual.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
01-26-2008, 01:40 PM | #6 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
I think that right now the smartest thing for the Redskins would be to hire Fassal as Head Coach and promote Blache to DC. I think that not only would that help the Redskins maintain continuity but Blache would appreciate the chance to be in a position where other teams would take him seriously as a Head Coaching canidate.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
01-26-2008, 01:45 PM | #7 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
The only way spagnuolo comes here is as a HC, no way the Giants let him go on a parallel move and if the Redskins give him an Associate HC title I can Guarantee you the Giants will match. So this can be tough.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
01-26-2008, 01:45 PM | #8 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Good post Matty and that may very well be Danny's thinking. However, I could see turning things over in the long term best interests of our team if we had a bad season. We won 4 of our last games and made the playoffs. What happened to the continuity? Or was the continuity Snyder and Cerrato?
|
01-26-2008, 01:50 PM | #9 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Like I've said in the Zorn thread, I love the move to get Jim Zorn. I wasn't very impressed with Al Saunders as an OC. I realize Saunders did great things in KC, but that just didn't translate in Washington. I never really felt we needed an offensive coordinator in the first place, but that's a whole different argument. In regards to signing your coordinators on before the head coach, I don't really see a problem with that. I think if anything, it just makes the eventual head coach's job that much easier. He won't have to worry about going out and finding guys to fill those coaching positions, they will already be in place. All he'll be concerned with is implementing the offseason game plan to get ready for next season.
Let us not forget that Gibbs is assisting in some sort of way. I would not be surprised at all if Gibbs is not telling Dan and Vinny who to pick up as coordinators.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
01-26-2008, 01:52 PM | #10 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,233
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
I AM ready for Schwartz as a possible DC. System would be relatively the same and I really do like the Zorn signing.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
01-26-2008, 01:52 PM | #11 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Quote:
As for Matty's premise on the long term viability of the staff (or lack thereof), I agree with that on the offensive side of the ball, but not on Defense. Williams is 49 or 50. He has some excellent young guys on his staff, particularly Jerry Gray and Kirk Olivadotti. Even with the loss of Sean Taylor, Laron Landry looked perfectly suited to step into Williams's deep FS role as exhibited by his two 4th quarter picks in the playoff game. If Fassel or someone else from the outside is hired as HC, I would feel a lot better if Jerry Gray was promoted to defensive coordinator. Gray also coached with Williams in Buffalo, and could bring some level of continuity to what Williams built on the Redskins D. |
|
01-26-2008, 01:55 PM | #12 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,427
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
I think these are all fair points, and for the record, I do think a staff of Fassel, Zorn, and some defensive coordinator to be named can be a good staff for the long haul.
But Matty, I really have a bone to pick with your argument, and it seems like a point made consistently by those supporting a decision passing over GW: Dan Snyder's ego. The point basically says Snyder has an ego, and plans on being heavily involved, so we need a coach who will fit in with that. And given that Snyder isn't going to back off, you're right. But why exactly are you comfortable with Snyder being involved? Why is Snyder given a free pass? Why does his ego HAVE to get in the way? Why can't Snyder be like Bob Kraft, or Jim Irsay, or the late Art Rooney, or the late Jack Kent Cooke? These men didn't/don't get involved in the football operations of the team. They scrutinize their coaches and GMs, but by no means are they involved in player-personnel decisions. But because Dan Snyder is involved, he needs someone he can work with. So we fire Marty after one season. He can't work with Gregg Williams. With Snyder's attitude, we significantly narrow the pool of coaching candidates he'll accept. A good owner will hire the best people and leave it up to them. He won't micromanage and try to do the GM's work for him. So the problem I have ultimately isn't with the coaching choice. The problem I have is Snyder can't put his big fat ego in check. He insists on getting in the way. And in my opinion, your points are even giving way to his ego. Given that Snyder's ego isn't going anywhere, I agree with the staffing choices being made. But man, where's the outrage at the ego? Maybe we need to parse the argument a little bit - do you feel Snyder should be involved in coaching and player personnel decisions? If so, why?
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
01-26-2008, 01:57 PM | #13 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Do you think Jeff Fisher will just let him go? Especially if the Redskins did screw over his best friend? The only way is if Williams goes back to the Titans with Schwartz becoming free to come here.
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
01-26-2008, 02:00 PM | #14 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Also want to add that for future reference, if the new OC and DC performs above expectations, then there should be some type of incentive in their contract. The incentive can be that if they perform above expectations, then they cannot be fired throughout their contract's lifespan if there is a change at head coach. At least that would maintain some sense of continuity regardless who the head coach is. Of course, if the OC and DC are performing above expectations and the Redskins are winning above .500, then the head coach probably wouldn't be fired in the first place. :-/
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
01-26-2008, 02:00 PM | #15 |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 58
Posts: 1,176
|
Re: Theory: Putting together a staff for the future
Given that Snyder's ego isn't going anywhere, I agree with the staffing choices being made. But man, where's the outrage at the ego?
He owns the team. He can do what he wants.
__________________
The eyes are the groin of the head |
|
|