Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought part two

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2008, 04:25 PM   #121
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
The Moss-Randle El duo were supposed to be just as lethal as those two are. I don't think a retooled OL alone is going to make JC a great QB and I do not want to wait for another 2-3 seasons for them to retool the OL only to find JC still is inadequate. Evaluate JC the rest of the way then the FO has to make a decision about him and they should open the QB position for competition in the preseason. Either the kid has it or he doesn't. Patrick Ramsey didn't get half the sympathy this kid gets.
No, he's definitely got it. Most of us have already seen it. Others, I'm not sure what type of team success measure you're waiting for, but I'm guessing that it doesn't actually reflect on Campbell as a player.

We are trying to find ways to improve his productivity. Giving him more time would be one. Allowing his young receivers to develop another.

I'm not even sure why rebuilding the OL would be a bad thing even if they QB was a problem.

Anyway, Randle El is thriving in his 3-5 targets a game role in the offense. Cooley is having a good season. Moss has been explosive. Campbell has fueled all three of these things. I think dependability is an issue that Moss cannot fix. Obviously someone needs to step up and help Campbell, and I'm confident that someone will soon, in the same way that Mason has stepped up and helped out Flacco.

I'm guessing that Campbell-Moss though is never going to be an elite passing combination. I have optimism that Campbell-Kelly will be.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-01-2008, 04:26 PM   #122
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Clearly we need to sign a QB to take JC's place.

Patrick Ramsey is an UFA, we should sign him maybe he'll finally get a chance to show his stuff. Gibran Hamdan is also available, we gave up on him wayyyyy to soon and should pick him up as he is probably ready to blossom.

C'mon guys, can we have just a bit of perspective? How many teams would snap up JC in a heartbeat if they had the chance? More than one or two.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 04:36 PM   #123
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

I want JC to suceed just as much as anyone, but I think he is just not good enough to lead us to a Superbowl. He just does not win games. At this point, he is a veteran. Joe Gibbs gave up two 1st rounders for him, and he has not produced. We have the weapons(Moss, Cooley, and Randel El), we have the running game, now its time we decide if we have a quarterback.
T.O.Killa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 04:40 PM   #124
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

One thought I have about JC, last year before his injury, I can think of several games where I thought he had cost us the game (i believe it was Dallas he threw a late int on). This year he is successfully (7 wins ) managing the games and absolutely not actively costing us any with a critically timed INT or Fumble. So I would say he has progressed in that way.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 04:41 PM   #125
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Clearly we need to sign a QB to take JC's place.

Patrick Ramsey is an UFA, we should sign him maybe he'll finally get a chance to show his stuff. Gibran Hamdan is also available, we gave up on him wayyyyy to soon and should pick him up as he is probably ready to blossom.

C'mon guys, can we have just a bit of perspective? How many teams would snap up JC in a heartbeat if they had the chance? More than one or two.
Not sure I would want to play for any of those teams that would snatch him up in a heartbeat. I have not given up on JC but his time to prove his ability is getting shorter.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 04:45 PM   #126
Bubba305-ST21-
Impact Rookie
 
Bubba305-ST21-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 38
Posts: 683
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

JC is a good quarterback. If the guy gets time back there, he has shown he can get it done, and how many dropped passes did we see yesterday or JC running for his life once again. Get off the guys back!!
__________________
never another.....R.I.P. Sean T #21
Bubba305-ST21- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 05:17 PM   #127
charlielyons
Special Teams
 
charlielyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

i like JC but i dont know if hes the answer....we are almost out of playoff contention. one more loss and the season is done..im then all for bringing in brennan to see what he can do....less we forget campbell had a losing record last year. coliins led us to the playoffs.
charlielyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 05:24 PM   #128
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.O.Killa View Post
I want JC to suceed just as much as anyone, but I think he is just not good enough to lead us to a Superbowl. He just does not win games. At this point, he is a veteran. Joe Gibbs gave up two 1st rounders for him, and he has not produced. We have the weapons(Moss, Cooley, and Randel El), we have the running game, now its time we decide if we have a quarterback.
I was at the game. What I noticed right off of the back was that JC didn't go through his progressions and never returned to the open receiver which on most occassions was Randle El. On several plays, Randle El was waving his hands signaling JC to throw the ball. Cooley was opened on several occassions too. It is frustrating to watch a team with so many weapons and have a QB struggle to get the ball to them. Malcolm Kelly was also overlooked on several plays. I have come to the conclusion that JC has become contempt with throwing the short ball and doesn't want to throw and INT even when it seems WRS are bigger than their defender.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 06:11 PM   #129
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNRA View Post
I was at the game. What I noticed right off of the back was that JC didn't go through his progressions and never returned to the open receiver which on most occassions was Randle El. On several plays, Randle El was waving his hands signaling JC to throw the ball. Cooley was opened on several occassions too. It is frustrating to watch a team with so many weapons and have a QB struggle to get the ball to them. Malcolm Kelly was also overlooked on several plays. I have come to the conclusion that JC has become contempt with throwing the short ball and doesn't want to throw and INT even when it seems WRS are bigger than their defender.

Dude, if you can see whether a QB goes through his progressions from the stands, you have magical powers. I can hardly make out whether JC is going through progressions on television.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 06:31 PM   #130
skinsnut
Playmaker
 
skinsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,058
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quarterbacks and Coaches always seem crappy after a few key losses.
There are about 50 other people that contribute to this.

Will Campbell ever be a Hall of Famer?
Doubtful

Can he be an effective game manager? Yes.
That is why he was drafted in the first place.
No one thought he'd be a Super Stud.

I'd say if he's ever a top 10 QB, he's reached his potential.
And that is not too far from where he is now.
He needs more time, more weapons and more experience.
We'll know by this time next year if we need to look elsewhere or stick with him for 5 more years.

We all hoped to know this by now...unfortunately, Campbell is still a question mark to me.
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period
skinsnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 07:45 PM   #131
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsnut View Post
Quarterbacks and Coaches always seem crappy after a few key losses.
There are about 50 other people that contribute to this.

Will Campbell ever be a Hall of Famer?
Doubtful

Can he be an effective game manager? Yes.
That is why he was drafted in the first place.
No one thought he'd be a Super Stud.

I'd say if he's ever a top 10 QB, he's reached his potential.
And that is not too far from where he is now.
He needs more time, more weapons and more experience.
We'll know by this time next year if we need to look elsewhere or stick with him for 5 more years.

We all hoped to know this by now...unfortunately, Campbell is still a question mark to me.
No one thought he'd be a super stud?! They gave up 3 draft picks for him so I think somebody thought he'd be pretty close to a super stud.

This time next year JC wont be the Skins starting QB.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 07:55 PM   #132
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,048
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
No one thought he'd be a super stud?! They gave up 3 draft picks for him so I think somebody thought he'd be pretty close to a super stud.

This time next year JC wont be the Skins starting QB.
Aren't these predictions of yours getting tired already?

I thought you said a similar thing last year or during the preseason?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 10:48 PM   #133
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Well, 4th year Campbell is significantly better than Rookie Flacco, but Flacco certainly isn't struggling...I mean he's having the best year of any QB in his division. And I think you have to credit the offense around him for that.
Huh? Mason is no Santana Moss. The running backs have been injured all season and if they weren't they're no Portis. So who in the hell he has for help. Last time i checked Ray Lewis and Reed dont play offense.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 11:19 PM   #134
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
Huh? Mason is no Santana Moss. The running backs have been injured all season and if they weren't they're no Portis. So who in the hell he has for help. Last time i checked Ray Lewis and Reed dont play offense.
Mason is more reliable than Santana Moss, and in our ball control offense, he would be more valuable to us. Clayton is the better Moss comparison anyway, as he's just as explosive, but has enjoyed a better season IMO.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 02:04 AM   #135
dmvskinzfan08
Impact Rookie
 
dmvskinzfan08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
Re: JC is not what I thought part two

Its a combination of things. For one when receviers are getting open its when people blitz us and then the o-line is not protecting us. When they dont blitz no one can get open. The o-line sucks. The D is to blame for a lot of this too. The Giants went right down the field with ease on their first drive. At this point the whole team stinks. I see no bright spots. So dont blame it all on JC. Plus CP is still hurt and teams double Moss and then we have nothing but the underneath stuff because the other receivers aren't getting open. My only real complaint about JC is he needs to throw a better deep ball. So he puts it infront of the receivers so only they can get it or its too long. He has under thrown a few passes this year.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21
HATERS << Misery Loves Company
dmvskinzfan08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.55109 seconds with 12 queries