Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Bulletin Board Material for SF Game!!

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-20-2004, 09:57 AM   #31
Redskins_P
Fight for old DC!
 
Redskins_P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by irish
Ok P, at least the skins won but had the D not scored that TD my score would have been almost exactly correct. The O is pathetic and until those problems are fixed this team cannot be taken seriously.
You're absolutely right irish. We could've scored more than 35 points if we would've scored TD's in the redzone.

It all starts with the o-line. We can't get any holes for Clinton in the redzone. Also Gibbs please stop calling plays that have the guard or tackle pulling. We need to run straight at em. Hit em in the mouth.
Redskins_P is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-20-2004, 10:12 AM   #32
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskins_P
You're absolutely right irish. We could've scored more than 35 points if we would've scored TD's in the redzone.

It all starts with the o-line. We can't get any holes for Clinton in the redzone. Also Gibbs please stop calling plays that have the guard or tackle pulling. We need to run straight at em. Hit em in the mouth.
hat on hat, let Portis pick his holes. i thought we learned that. it only took us the whole season, and now we're going back. grrr.

we don;t have the personnel to hit em in the mouth, until we do, we have the personnel to cut block the Dline and outrun the chasing linebackers. not very Gibbs i know.

think Gibbs wanted to experiment his old way against the lowly 9'ers and you could see Portis wasn't happy.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 10:29 AM   #33
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
I think we've got to give some credit to the 49ers, they played the run pretty tough and they didn't just roll over for us. San Fran is 13th in the league against the rush, so they're not exactly a pushover.

And didn't Portis end up with 110 yards on the ground? It might not have been a pretty 100 yard day but hey, it got the job done.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 10:38 AM   #34
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Portis did get 100 yds but it took what 45 carries. Thats around 3 yds per carry. Not pretty is the understatement of the week. This O has serious problems and until these are fixed the redskins cant be taken seriously. I knew this would be a close game by the fact of the redskins putrid offense. Every redskin win will be close as long as this offense continues to stink.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 10:42 AM   #35
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
Portis was 33 for 103 yards I belive. Not staggering numbers, but stilll got 100.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 10:51 AM   #36
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
but 0 TDs, from inside the 10, vs the 49ers. there's a problem there. our DEFENSIVE line had more to do with Portis's carries than our offensive line did.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 11:20 AM   #37
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
Checking on nfl.com, portis had 35 carries for 110 yds. Thats 3.1 yds per carry.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 12:14 PM   #38
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
checking on nfl.com we got the 'W'

I really don't care how it happened

Irish, we're 5-9, who's taking us seriously anyway??

Yeah we have problems at the goal line, but at least we can move the ball, that's a huge improvement from earlier in the year.

Those 35 carries from Portis helped us have a large advantage in TOP with 36:59 to 23:01.

Like I said, not pretty but effective.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 12:36 PM   #39
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
checking on nfl.com we got the 'W'

I really don't care how it happened
vs. any other team in the league i would agree with you.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 12:48 PM   #40
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
vs. any other team in the league i would agree with you.
It's too late to be worried about style points, at this point I'll take the W's any way they come.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 01:01 PM   #41
irish
Playmaker
 
irish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
I guess I am confused about scoring TDs is considered "style points". Moving the ball and TOP are great (and so was the W) but having 1st and goal on the 3 vs maybe the worst team in the NFL and not scoring both times is downright lousy.

Its effective vs the bad teams but not scoring against the good teams only ensures a L.
irish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 01:05 PM   #42
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
I'm not downplaying the importance of scoring especially when you have 1st and goal, but look at the big picture for a moment. We controlled the clock and most importantly we won the game. It wasn't pretty but a win is always a win no matter how you get to the end result. I doubt the Eagles are complaining after a 12-7 win over Dallas.

Sure it would have been nice to come away with at least one TD down there, preferably two, but with the season we've had I'm not going to complain about a win.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 01:34 PM   #43
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by irish
I guess I am confused about scoring TDs is considered "style points". Moving the ball and TOP are great (and so was the W) but having 1st and goal on the 3 vs maybe the worst team in the NFL and not scoring both times is downright lousy.

Its effective vs the bad teams but not scoring against the good teams only ensures a L.
here here. the Skins' have it in their minds they are a better team than their record. and they are, and that mentality is what keeps the team from 'accepting' their record and giving up. not punching it in like that vs. such a bad team affects the team's confidence. Portis looked less happy on saturday 17 points ahead and having more yards than he did 3 points down vs. Philly with less yards.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.67215 seconds with 12 queries