Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-06-2012, 02:04 AM   #1036
skinsecity
Camp Scrub
 
skinsecity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Let's say if Shannahan drafts a rookie QB and get Orton. Let's say we have another losing season do you think he gets fired? Also, I know you don't like this but when does Daniel Snyder step in you think. I mean if this year is like this past season and we have the qb mess. Wouln't you wanna step in? I think Snyder has been patient, but Bruce Allen/Mike Shannahan are running out time. Thoughts?
skinsecity is offline  

Advertisements
Old 02-06-2012, 02:18 AM   #1037
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,350
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsecity View Post
Let's say if Shannahan drafts a rookie QB and get Orton. Let's say we have another losing season do you think he gets fired? Also, I know you don't like this but when does Daniel Snyder step in you think. I mean if this year is like this past season and we have the qb mess. Wouln't you wanna step in? I think Snyder has been patient, but Bruce Allen/Mike Shannahan are running out time. Thoughts?
I feel it may depend on how they play. If we play the same way we played last season, I can see why MS would be fired. But if we have a Panthers' type of a season, then maybe Snyder gives him another year.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 02:20 AM   #1038
TenandSix:Unacceptable
Special Teams
 
TenandSix:Unacceptable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

If we wind up with Peyton, is it crazy that I'd consider Richardson at #6?

Just those two alone would be such a tremendous boost to our offense.

We'd actually, you know, keep some opposing coaches up at night don't you think?
TenandSix:Unacceptable is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 02:23 AM   #1039
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82 View Post
Fisher might look at RGIII like McNair they are/were both mobile/accurate/leaders.
Sounds feasible at first...but then you remember McNair was a tough ass dude, like the QB version of Ray Lewis. RGIII won't be the same type of mobile QB. On the scramble to pass spectrum, RGIII will be as far to the "pass" end as Vick is to the "scramble" end.

RGIII may well be the most exciting player in this year's draft, but I bet he's not among the top three QB's from this draft five years from now.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 02:28 AM   #1040
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechanix544 View Post
The more time goes along, the more I think that we are going to get Manning. Sign Peyton Manning, draft the best O Lineman in the first, Foles in the second, and throw a bunch of money at Vincent Jackson and Dwayne Bowe, and the best corner we can afford.

Manning teaching Foles, without the threat of a Luck behind him, tossing it to VJax and Hankerson, and Fred Davis, and dont forget Gaffney, as well as a great pass catching RB in Helu. Dont forget that Peyton Manning will make everyone on the Offense, EVERYONE, look alot better, including our line and receivers. We keep our pass rushing talent, peyton gets a much better defense than he ever had in indy, and we strengthen some pieces this offseason, making our offense much more polished and talented in the process. Oh, and we have our QB of the future in Foles.........

I definitely would not hate it if the Redskins get a Peyton Manning here, still in his mid thirties, with a chip on his shoulder. Mike Shanahan could not lose with this plan, he is instantly turning the squad into a contender, while still preserving our future in Foles, a very talented capable young QB.

Sign my ass up, I think I just talked myself into wanting peyton manning on our team.
That's good stuff 544!! I dig the optimism! Still can't understand why Peyton would want to come her, but maybe this is BA's off-season to shine???
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 02:31 AM   #1041
WilbursHomie
Special Teams
 
WilbursHomie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 319
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Is this a serious question? I'm pretty confident it's a joke but even if it is I don't really see the hilarity.
Yes, a joke. I kind of feel bad for the Giants. The media's gonna talk about this win for 1 day and then turn their attention to the Peyton fiasco that's going to follow.
WilbursHomie is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 08:50 AM   #1042
Higskin
Camp Scrub
 
Higskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Metro area
Posts: 74
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
How much of a stake are we talking?
Perhaps I'm being naive but Manning's net worth is $115 million and has the money now to invest.

Peyton Manning Net Worth ‹ 2012 Celebrity Net Worth

Snyder is a shrewd businss man with the #2 most valuable franchise ($1.55 bil), always looking for ways/people to increase the "excitement" and revenue of the product. For example, we're going to eventually need a new stadium to keep up with the "Jones" in TX.


I could see him working out a post career minority investor deal with Manning.
__________________
The future is now ~ George Allen
Higskin is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 09:54 AM   #1043
diehard
The Starter
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Higskin View Post
Perhaps I'm being naive but Manning's net worth is $115 million and has the money now to invest.

Peyton Manning Net Worth ‹ 2012 Celebrity Net Worth

Snyder is a shrewd businss man with the #2 most valuable franchise ($1.55 bil), always looking for ways/people to increase the "excitement" and revenue of the product. For example, we're going to eventually need a new stadium to keep up with the "Jones" in TX.


I could see him working out a post career minority investor deal with Manning.
Uh, no.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.'
diehard is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:05 AM   #1044
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Maybe he could replace Sam Huff on the radio broadcast team?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 10:56 AM   #1045
Jontrem
Impact Rookie
 
Jontrem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 608
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by TenandSix:Unacceptable View Post
If we wind up with Peyton, is it crazy that I'd consider Richardson at #6?

Just those two alone would be such a tremendous boost to our offense.

We'd actually, you know, keep some opposing coaches up at night don't you think?
If we can get a healthy Peyton in FA then I dont think anyone would complain about whatever we do with out draft but RB is not our 2nd or 3rd or even our fourth biggest need aside from QB, so I would rather see them draft someone else at #6. If we already had peyton at draft time then I would want WR (only if Blackmon is there) and if not then Nest available Oline.
Jontrem is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:44 AM   #1046
TenandSix:Unacceptable
Special Teams
 
TenandSix:Unacceptable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jontrem View Post
If we can get a healthy Peyton in FA then I dont think anyone would complain about whatever we do with out draft but RB is not our 2nd or 3rd or even our fourth biggest need aside from QB, so I would rather see them draft someone else at #6. If we already had peyton at draft time then I would want WR (only if Blackmon is there) and if not then Nest available Oline.
The thing is, we lack playmakers. I view Richardson as one of the premier ones coming into the draft. Helu and Royster are nice players, don't get me wrong, but they are not on the same level IMO.

And I'm someone who usually would go against drafting RB that high. It's just an intriguing option to me given who's likely going to be available when we pick.
TenandSix:Unacceptable is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 11:57 AM   #1047
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
Teams don't ditch a potential franchise QB because they 'prefer' another QB.

When a franchise makes the decision that they 'prefer' another QB they are telling everyone that they don't believe the QB the had could become a franchise QB.
That is the ultimate de-valution.

You can label it however you like.
But if the Rams draft RGIII it is what it is.

All this is moot though, because I don't think the Rams are gonna draft RGIII.
And if they do I would be more then happy for the Allen/Shanahan to steal Bradford from them on the cheap.
Who are you referring to when you say "franchise" because in St louis the decision makers who believed in Bradford are all gone?
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:04 PM   #1048
Jontrem
Impact Rookie
 
Jontrem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 608
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by TenandSix:Unacceptable View Post
The thing is, we lack playmakers. I view Richardson as one of the premier ones coming into the draft. Helu and Royster are nice players, don't get me wrong, but they are not on the same level IMO.

And I'm someone who usually would go against drafting RB that high. It's just an intriguing option to me given who's likely going to be available when we pick.
Yeah I agree we need playmakers on this team but with that in mind wouldn't you think Blackmon is more of a playmaker?
Jontrem is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:23 PM   #1049
TenandSix:Unacceptable
Special Teams
 
TenandSix:Unacceptable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 331
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jontrem View Post
Yeah I agree we need playmakers on this team but with that in mind wouldn't you think Blackmon is more of a playmaker?
Blackmon's not going to be there when we pick. @ 6 it looks like our options are going to be Richardson, Reiff and maybe Claiborne. If not we'll need to trade down or reach.

I'm not actually against any of those options. I just wouldn't necessarily rule out drafting Richardson at this point.
TenandSix:Unacceptable is offline  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:43 PM   #1050
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,350
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

For those that want Richardson I ask, when was the last time a premier RB started in the Super Bowl?

We've had a lot of RBs by committee in the SB for the past couple of seasons, including this year's SB. I just feel that spending a top 10 pick on a RB is not that much worth it anymore.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.42780 seconds with 12 queries