Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2012, 11:05 AM   #1156
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
Ah... that makes a ton more sense. When he is doing the star trek parody.
that's it
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline  

Advertisements
Old 02-07-2012, 11:11 AM   #1157
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,639
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by los panda View Post
it was an ace ventura reference. my bad
its all good, nobody picked up on my Big Lebowski reference last night.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:14 AM   #1158
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
Orton + Tannehill/Cousins = Last Place in 2012 & 2013.

Manning/Tannehill or a trade up are the only options IMO.
How do you figure?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:16 AM   #1159
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,594
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I started up a Madden franchise and put Manning on the Skins and let me tell you, he looks great in the B&G. Championship!
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:19 AM   #1160
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,878
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

I hope PM never comes to DC it will just be more egg on our face. How many washed up QB's can we have? I am tired of it.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:20 AM   #1161
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,594
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Unlike another veteran who still doesn't seem to realize that he's washed up, I doubt Manning tries to play unless he's 110% confident he can play at a high level.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop

Last edited by MTK; 02-07-2012 at 11:21 AM.
MTK is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:34 AM   #1162
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
How do you figure?
I don't think Tannehill or Cousins will be able to start and win at all in 2012 and then in 2013 either one would be essentially a rookie. So basically any winning we do in the next 2 years would likely be put on Orton's shoulders. Orton would be the 4th best QB in the NFC East. It's not enough of an upgrade for me to feel confident. Maybe locking them into last place was over stating it but how much better is Orton then Grossman? I know he's better but in my opinion he's not enough of an upgrade to pair with a rookie who could be a couple years away.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:36 AM   #1163
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
I often confuse doctors and pool men, too. They are just so similar what with the fact that both doctors and pool men have to endure eight years of education and training on top of their four year Bachelors degrees. Honestly, if you put two up side by side, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference...
and then there's all the bodily fluids they deal with... :vomit:

A human body is mostly water, a pool is mostly water.

All the chemicals they have to prescribe....
SBXVII is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:36 AM   #1164
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,639
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

NFL would eat up this Peyton to DC move. Goodell would be drooling to Brother vs Brother twice a year especially with Eli winning his second superbowl. You know Snyder is telling Bruce and Shanny to make it happen
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:44 AM   #1165
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,878
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Unlike another veteran who still doesn't seem to realize that he's washed up, I doubt Manning tries to play unless he's 110% confident he can play at a high level.

That is what I am afraid.

If we can get PM just as a FA and then draft Tannehill then I am cool with that.

I just think if PM comes here we will just be glued to the injury line every week waiting to see if he is going to play.

If I am PM I am going to Bal, AZ, SF, etc... basically a team that is a QB away from the Super Bowl.

Let me also add B-more would be a great landing spot for him. they could keep Flacco and have him learn from PM and PM could get them to the SB. After PM retires Flacco comes back with some great QB coaching. One of the negatives about Flacco is he doesn't have anyone pushing him, PM could do that.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!

Last edited by mredskins; 02-07-2012 at 11:46 AM.
mredskins is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:54 AM   #1166
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,515
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post

One of the comments from that McNabb article.

Quote:
The groundskeepers who will have to replace his divots just sighed..

__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty
NC_Skins is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:57 AM   #1167
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Unlike another veteran who still doesn't seem to realize that he's washed up, I doubt Manning tries to play unless he's 110% confident he can play at a high level.
THAT is not going to sit well with ShadowByte......
Then again...TO can probably get him a tryout.
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs

Last edited by Hog1; 02-07-2012 at 11:58 AM.
Hog1 is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 11:57 AM   #1168
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,594
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
That is what I am afraid.

If we can get PM just as a FA and then draft Tannehill then I am cool with that.

I just think if PM comes here we will just be glued to the injury line every week waiting to see if he is going to play.

If I am PM I am going to Bal, AZ, SF, etc... basically a team that is a QB away from the Super Bowl.

Let me also add B-more would be a great landing spot for him. they could keep Flacco and have him learn from PM and PM could get them to the SB. After PM retires Flacco comes back with some great QB coaching. One of the negatives about Flacco is he doesn't have anyone pushing him, PM could do that.
I really doubt Flacco would be down with that plan.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop

Last edited by MTK; 02-07-2012 at 11:58 AM.
MTK is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 12:03 PM   #1169
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,878
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I really doubt Flacco would be down with that plan.

IT is not up to him. Flacco is not that good. they honestly could get rid of Flacco and say Ed, Ray and Peyton here is your best shot of getting another ring before you guys are done. I say they have 2 years of legit shots at a SB ring.

After that the Ravens start rebuilding but they would would really only need to fill a few holes becasue they have draft so well over the years.

Also I don't know why you love Flacco so much. Even this past summer you argued with him he still had growing to do and I said he has peaked. Well guess what we were both wrong he decreased.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!

Last edited by mredskins; 02-07-2012 at 12:07 PM.
mredskins is offline  
Old 02-07-2012, 12:08 PM   #1170
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
I don't think Tannehill or Cousins will be able to start and win at all in 2012 and then in 2013 either one would be essentially a rookie. So basically any winning we do in the next 2 years would likely be put on Orton's shoulders. Orton would be the 4th best QB in the NFC East. It's not enough of an upgrade for me to feel confident. Maybe locking them into last place was over stating it but how much better is Orton then Grossman? I know he's better but in my opinion he's not enough of an upgrade to pair with a rookie who could be a couple years away.
So if I'm understanding you right. Manning/Tannehill is better than Orton/Tannehill because with the former we have a better chance of avoiding the division cellar in 2012 and 2013. But really what you're saying is Manning over the next two years is better than Orton over the next two years? Tannehill is kind of irrelevant to your discussion
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.48614 seconds with 12 queries