Fred Davis Done for Season. Welcome Back Cooley

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Page 118 on the Bucs gameday thread ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol, think he said it on multiple pages too. top 10 epic fails on the board

[htownskinfan]

I watched some of the game last nite on NFL rewind.I was impressed with Paulson and he looked quicker then Cooley has the past few years.He had some nice catches.Paul on the other hand drops a td pass in his hands.I like Cooley but I would like the order to be Paulson,Cooley,Paul

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by htownskinfan

I watched some of the game last nite on NFL rewind.I was impressed with Paulson and he looked quicker then Cooley has the past few years.He had some nice catches.Paul on the other hand drops a td pass in his hands.I like Cooley but I would like the order to be Paulson,Cooley,Paul

It will be Paul, Paulson, Cooley

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

It will be Paul, Paulson, Cooley

Niles Paul starts? Wow surprisingly stupid. His play has been garbage on the field, he needs to step it up

[Meks]

which is very puzzling and i think it will change fast.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Niles Paul starts? Wow surprisingly stupid. His play has been garbage on the field, he needs to step it up

Well that's the depth chart. But those often mean nothing

[rypper11]

Paul is a beast on ST. TE? not so much. Paulson, Cooley, Paulson, IMO should be depth. Though I think they are trying to get Paul into the flex position of the pistol like Davis was to catch the quick slant off the playaction read.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by rypper11

Paul is a beast on ST. TE? not so much. Paulson, Cooley, Paulson, IMO should be depth. Though I think they are trying to get Paul into the flex position of the pistol like Davis was to catch the quick slant off the playaction read.

Well there is never a better time to shine than stepping in for an injuried player. Pauleson was top notch last Sunday, I have a hard time believing Paul could have made the same plays. Who knows maybe he steps his game up, but he is a beast on special teams.

[SmootSmack]

Yeah I think Paul's expected increase role on offense is one reason why they signed KW. To make up for Paul on special teams

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Well he has been an OC for what six years? Had some really good talent in Houston, whom by the way, have not missed a beat since he left. What he did here in Washington his first two years was - well- no comment. Now RG-3 is making him a genius again. Man up? Maybe. Step in a big pile of shit when they landed RG-3 to save his job? More like it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your argument is one of distanced generalizations and thereby is not fair to Kyle. You have to look directly at how Kyle does his job.

For sure, last year I criticized Kyle a lot on this board. Certainly he had little talent to work with but I felt he did a poor job of maximizing what talent he had, which is his job.

This year, however, Kyle has been bringing it. It is not just that he has a brilliant new QB. On a weekly basis this year Kyle has been excellent in exploring new wrinkles and putting Gryphon in a position to succeed. Our exciting new offense is more than just RGIII - it is also Kyle's doing a bang-up job of getting people into positions for success.

[CultBrennan59]

I hope you all know that Niles is arguably our best blocker on the team that isn't on the OL. I watched parts of the Giants game last night and he was blowing back LBs, Safeties and did fairly well against the DL (well except Pierre Paul, but no one can really block that guy one on one). His catching will improve the more he gets thrown to.

[MTK]

Good post Lotus. It just doesn't make sense to put all the blame on Kyle for when things weren't going well with Rex and Beck at the helm, and now with RG3 it seems there are folks that want to give all the credit to RG3 and none to Kyle.

And given the high level of production the offense has put out this year, the fact that some are still bitching about Kyle just rings of hater-ade to me. Give it up already. If we had a middle of the pack D we'd probably have 2-3 more wins. The offense clearly isn't our problem.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

I hope you all know that Niles is arguably our best blocker on the team that isn't on the OL. I watched parts of the Giants game last night and he was blowing back LBs, Safeties and did fairly well against the DL (well except Pierre Paul, but no one can really block that guy one on one). His catching will improve the more he gets thrown to.

I think he is a great blocker, but that is ONE block you have to make everytime. That was a huge mistake, dont blow it off saying no one makes that, thats crap.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

I hope you all know that Niles is arguably our best blocker on the team that isn't on the OL. I watched parts of the Giants game last night and he was blowing back LBs, Safeties and did fairly well against the DL (well except Pierre Paul, but no one can really block that guy one on one). His catching will improve the more he gets thrown to.

Arguably our best blocker not on the OL and not named Royster or Morgan

[Meks]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Yeah I think Paul's expected increase role on offense is one reason why they signed KW. To make up for Paul on special teams

so we want to 'make up for' one of our best special teams players to put him on offense where he hasnt done well? cool. sounds smart.