Eagles ink McCants?

MTK · 09-03-2005, 12:46 AM

Well, last year on only 45 catches Moss had 5 scores. Still pretty effective for a short guy.

I think this need for a big WR thing is really overblown.

Besides, most of the time our offense sputtered in the redzone because we couldn't convert short yardage situations. We had Gardner last year, if being tall is all that was needed, why didn't we just toss it to him down there?

There's obviously more to being successful in the redzone than just having a tall WR.

09-03-2005, 12:46 AM	#39
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,050	Re: Eagles ink McCants? Well, last year on only 45 catches Moss had 5 scores. Still pretty effective for a short guy. I think this need for a big WR thing is really overblown. Besides, most of the time our offense sputtered in the redzone because we couldn't convert short yardage situations. We had Gardner last year, if being tall is all that was needed, why didn't we just toss it to him down there? There's obviously more to being successful in the redzone than just having a tall WR.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Eagles ink McCants?

Locker Room Main Forum