Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-12-2005, 11:16 AM   #18
Top-Skin-K
Camp Scrub
 
Top-Skin-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 13
Re: Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)

I really get a kick out of a lot of you guys!!! This is a hall of fame coaching staff and they know exactly what they are doing and how they want it done. Everyone forgets this offseason when LA was upset because we brought him back to soon. OK, he may be 100% now but he missed a lot of training camp and conditioning. He should be getting where he needs to be shape wise. All this trade and release talk of LA is rediculous. He's not going anywhere!!! He just signed a new contract in the offseason. IMO, this all boils down to him not reaching incentives in the contract and for him not to make the pro bowl this year. We don't want him to get his two pro bowls so fast so he can opt to leave. Did anyone see the pressure he put on Matt H. when he was flushed to LA's side and LA was on him like he stole something. Matt H. ended up throwing the ball away but it was an errant pass; possible turnover. We don't want to give that up, believe me. When LA can't make it to the pro bowl we will see more of him. IMO
Top-Skin-K is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.54792 seconds with 11 queries