Portis v. Betts: The Grass is Always Greener

[Sheriff Gonna Getcha]

I posted this in another thread, but I am also posting it here because it is appropriate.

Offensive lines in Seattle, St. Louis, KC and NYJ are having an awful time opening running lanes for their backs. And, to no surprise, Shawn Alexander, Steven Jackson, Larry Johnson, and Thomas Jones are having a really hard time running the ball. Did all of those guys suddenly lose their talent or desire to win? No and the same is true of Portis.

If Portis had not been injured in 2006 making an all-out effort to tackle a guy, we wouldn't be talking about Portis having lost it. We would simply be saying that Portis, like Jackson, Alexander, Johnson, and Jones is a victim of circumstance. To be honest, it kind of makes me nauseous to trash a guy like Portis who goes all out on every play (and is worse for the wear for it).

I do appreciate the stats and thought that you have put into this thread dgack. Your posts have been among the most coherent and best-supported on this site in the past week or so. But, putting the stats aside, are you honestly seeing the O-line doing a good job opening lanes? If so, why is Betts rushing for under 3 yards per carry? I realize that Betts needs to find a rhythm, but less than 3 yards per carry (the worst of his career)? So Portis is having the worst year (ypc-wise) and it is because he is washed up, meanwhile Betts is averaging a full ypc less than Portis and he is a victim of circumstance (i.e., not getting the ball enough and playing behind a poor o-line)?

Seriously, Washington fans are almost never pleased with who is playing. They almost always want the "other" guy, even if the current starter guy holds the franchise record for most rushing yards in a season. And the worst of it all is those same people are the ones who complain about the lack of stability, the player turnover, and "little Danny's free agent spending sprees." Give me a -------- break.