2005 Question: Who benched Lavar Arrington and Why?

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

What do you mean "they wouldn't do both" I don't follow

He means that, according to LaVar, management wouldn't (1) agree to restructure his contract; and (2) do so in a manner so that would "guarantee certain players got guaranteed contracts, or [that] they wouldn't get cut[.]"

It's the choice to believe in part (2) that just makes me laugh inside. It's such a preposterous proposition - like any management anywhere would even entertain such a request (And people accuse me of believing in fairy tales!!). I am sure LaVar has convinced himself this is how it all went down but I am also sure he has convinced himself of many alternate realities.

But, as #56 said, whatever floats your boat dude. He is a fanatic after all.