Over-Merging of threads?

Huddle · 03-02-2006, 05:26 PM

My suggestion is that the moderators focus on seeing that threads are labelled clearly and that any debate doesn't disintegrate into personal attacks.

What difference does it make to the rest of us if two or three posters want to rehash the Brunell-Ramsey topic? We're not obligated to read it.

As for limiting the number of posts, I don't see the sense in that. Recently, while lurking on a Dophins board, I came across a 700+ posts thread discussing the 2006 draft that was the most interesting I've come across on fansites. The main posters were very knowledgeable. If they weren't Dolphins' scouts, they could have been.

View Poll Results: Should the mods ease up on the merging of threads?
Yes, the threads are becoming unmanagebly big and new ones should be started.	29	52.73%
Yes, threads on different topics are being merged	6	10.91%
No, there are too many threads on the same topic	17	30.91%
No, for whatever reason.	3	5.45%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

03-02-2006, 05:26 PM	#19
Huddle Special Teams Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 352	Re: Over-Merging of threads? My suggestion is that the moderators focus on seeing that threads are labelled clearly and that any debate doesn't disintegrate into personal attacks. What difference does it make to the rest of us if two or three posters want to rehash the Brunell-Ramsey topic? We're not obligated to read it. As for limiting the number of posts, I don't see the sense in that. Recently, while lurking on a Dophins board, I came across a 700+ posts thread discussing the 2006 draft that was the most interesting I've come across on fansites. The main posters were very knowledgeable. If they weren't Dolphins' scouts, they could have been.

Over-Merging of threads?

Locker Room Main Forum