|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Toughest out of division game in 2007? | |||
Bears | 11 | 8.46% | |
Patriots | 116 | 89.23% | |
other | 3 | 2.31% | |
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-13-2007, 03:57 PM | #14 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Let's Discuss the 2007 Schedule
Quote:
I see what you are saying with the long sustained 12-15 drives point. It takes a lot more execution to execute 15 successful plays than one big one. But this is the philosophy of big plays to me. As far as I'm concered, big plays are a random occurence. The whole philosophy behind running the sustained offense, is that every once in a while, things are going to line up just perfectly so that after your receiver makes the catch or after the RB breaks through the initial wave of defenders, there is a golden plated path to the end zone. Think Chris Cooley vs. Carolina this year or Steve Smith in the 2nd OT vs. the Rams in the 2003 playoffs. If you try to force the ball deep in an illadvised situation, you greatly increase your chances for an interception. It's a low pct. attempt. More than likely, the pass will fall incomplete and you really hurt an otherwise successful drive. Trying to "force" big plays is a bad idea. The QB should be taking his shots once in awhile, but then again, Brunell and McNair both did this--even in 2006. The problem with Campbell early on is that he was taking his shot every other play, and ended up completing about 50% of his passes. Drives weren't sustained, and the TOP swung heavily in favor of our opponents. Campbell seemed to learn something the last two games of the season. Instead of forcing the ball into impossible coverages downfield, he took the intermediate routes. Campbell played really well those last two games, even though the defense gave him little help.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|