Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


ARE vs. Lloyd for the number 2 WR spot

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-01-2007, 04:53 PM   #10
Bill B
Impact Rookie
 
Bill B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
Re: ARE vs. Llyod for the number 2 WR spot

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
Thats what I remember but several here are bashing him for something that he may or may not of had any control. Yes, he did have a bad year but dang Moss's number where down by about half from the prior year. We do know that Lloyd spent the off season working hard to get into shape so why not wait until the season to see if he is ready to get thing going. I do think that thrash should see more time on the field because it just seems that he makes the plays when we need them.
So basically what you are saying is he did not report in shape for his first season as a Redskin? Why didn't the guy come in shape when he was traded for? The Redskins traded 2 picks and gave him a $10 million signing bonus to show they were committed to him, yet he did not have the desire to come in last year in shape and ready to produce?

This is why I hate the signing bonuses that are unrelated to perfomance - because even if he does awful this year and the Skins cut him he gets the last laugh in that he has already banked a boatload of cash.
Bill B is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.49948 seconds with 11 queries