Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him? - Commanders Post at The Warpath

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him?

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him?

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

10-23-2007, 08:50 PM #1

paulskinsfan

Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2005

Location: West VA

Posts: 726

Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him?

So, the defense is back and it is run totally by GW. The offense goes through Saunders, but if we have the lead then Gibbs greatly influences the playcalling to be more conservative. If GW is calling all the defense, and Saunders calls the plays until we get a lead, that begs the question: Are we 4-2 because of Joe, or in spite of him?

paulskinsfan

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by paulskinsfan

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:08 AM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 5.47304 seconds with 11 queries

10-23-2007, 08:50 PM	#1
paulskinsfan Registered User Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: West VA Posts: 726	Are we 4-2 because of Gibbs, or in spite of him? So, the defense is back and it is run totally by GW. The offense goes through Saunders, but if we have the lead then Gibbs greatly influences the playcalling to be more conservative. If GW is calling all the defense, and Saunders calls the plays until we get a lead, that begs the question: Are we 4-2 because of Joe, or in spite of him?