Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon
Let's try to be objective here for just a moment:
At the top of his game, Randy Moss is better than ANY WR the Redskins have put on the field since Bobby Mitchell retired - - and maybe he's even better than Bobby Mitchell. None of the heroes this team has put on the field for the past decade can even aspire to be a jock-sniffer in the elite status that Randy Moss and a few other WRs in NFL history inhabit.
In case I haven't made myself clear, Randy Moss is so much better than any WR the Redskins have been able to put on the field in the past 30 years that it isn't even worthy of discussion.
So ... should the Skins try to sign him? No!
Randy Moss has shown in college and in the NFL that he excels under two different sets of circumstances:
1. HE is THE man and the focus of ALL the offensive accolades for the team.
or
2. The team is destined for the Super Bowl - - or better yet - - is destined to be undefeated for the season.
Neither of these conditions is likely to obtain in Washington in 2008 or 2009 or 2010 and that's the length of time - at a minimum - it will take to sign Moss and pay him and have his guaranteed money spread out sufficiently that it does not turn him into a salary cap nightmare.
Bottom Line: He's not worth the risk/cost.
|
I couldnt have said it better myself. The Skins dont win enough to keep Moss happy and out of trouble. He might be worth the risk/cost for some teams but not the Skins.