Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Which Current NFL Receiver Is Best for Us?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Which WR is the Best Fit for the Redskins?
Bernard Berrian 12 5.50%
Bryant Johnson 16 7.34%
Chad Johnson 52 23.85%
DJ Hackett 42 19.27%
Javon Walker 7 3.21%
Ernest Wilford 6 2.75%
Roy Williams 74 33.94%
Other (tell us who) 9 4.13%
Voters: 218. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-24-2008, 02:24 AM   #11
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Which Current NFL Receiver Is Best for Us?

Looks like we got another potential Reciever. Either way I still say that Hacket is the guy that gets the nod. Besides we can sign Roy Williams next year.


Muhammad market taking shape

Muhsin Muhammad | Bears | Interested: 49ers? Panthers? Redskins?
Muhammad is drawing interest from the Redskins, Panthers and 49ers, according to John Clayton. Muhammad was released by the Bears on Feb. 18 after three years in Chicago. The 34-year-old wide receiver spent the first nine years of his career in Carolina.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.97006 seconds with 12 queries