Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack
Post #7 was probably crossing the line by Schneed. But post #5? No problem with that one. He attacked your idea, not you.
|
I don't know which one is which, he's on my ignore list for good reason. If it's the one that matty quoted, the idiot part is certainly attacking.
Quote:
And why shouldn't he? On the one hand, you're complaining on this site about the Redskins throwing away their draft picks for Chad Johnson (even though it's really just one pick in 2008, and CJ has proven to be an elite WR, and we need a WR, and we can still fill several other needs even with this trade), yet here you are suggesting we trade up for Darren McFadden (even though that would mean giving up draft picks, McFadden is unproven, and RB is so low on the need list)
The thread may not be retarded, but your recommendation (especially in light of your Chad Johnson stance) is questionable, at best.
|
It's all for discussion, it doesn't mean I have to beleive it. I already said I don't think we should trade up. However, if we were to offer say Portis for the 5th pick to get McFadden, I think I might pull that trigger.
Since when are discussions a bad idea?