Retrospect: Should we have IR'd Malcolm Kelly?

GMScud · 10-07-2008, 01:01 AM

Malcolm Kelly has yet to make any contribution this year due to injury. Now it appears that despite recovering from the ankle, his bad knee is back again.

Should we have IR'd Kelly when putting together the 53-man and opted for another player, WR or other - maybe Billy McMullen?

From the Post (the snipet about Kelly is on the 2nd page of the article):

Rookie wide receiver Malcolm Kelly played sparingly after finally coming back from a knee injury, but his knee is swelling again, so his status will be evaluated through the week. . .

Brooks Continues To Struggle - washingtonpost.com

10-07-2008, 01:01 AM	#1
GMScud Swearinger Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 12,626	Retrospect: Should we have IR'd Malcolm Kelly? Malcolm Kelly has yet to make any contribution this year due to injury. Now it appears that despite recovering from the ankle, his bad knee is back again. Should we have IR'd Kelly when putting together the 53-man and opted for another player, WR or other - maybe Billy McMullen? From the Post (the snipet about Kelly is on the 2nd page of the article): Rookie wide receiver Malcolm Kelly played sparingly after finally coming back from a knee injury, but his knee is swelling again, so his status will be evaluated through the week. . . Brooks Continues To Struggle - washingtonpost.com __________________ Tardy

Retrospect: Should we have IR'd Malcolm Kelly?

Locker Room Main Forum