Are the Nationals really that bad?

Monkeydad · 04-15-2009, 11:33 AM

Lastings, the bum, was sent down to AAA.

Dukes is better anyways and should be starting over Milledge.

But yeah, they're THAT bad. Other than a core of a few players like Zimmerman, Dukes, Dunn...they're not much better than some teams' AAA teams. They have NO pitching.

They could challenge the O's 0-21 start!

The Orioles always seem to start out seasons hot, then fade after a month or two. It's still great to see Boston in the basement at 2-5!

04-15-2009, 11:33 AM	#10
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 45 Posts: 17,460	Re: Are the Nationals really that bad? Lastings, the bum, was sent down to AAA. Dukes is better anyways and should be starting over Milledge. But yeah, they're THAT bad. Other than a core of a few players like Zimmerman, Dukes, Dunn...they're not much better than some teams' AAA teams. They have NO pitching. They could challenge the O's 0-21 start! The Orioles always seem to start out seasons hot, then fade after a month or two. It's still great to see Boston in the basement at 2-5! __________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster

Are the Nationals really that bad?

Other Sports