![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: 2011 Opening Day Starting QB | |||
| John Beck |
|
7 | 3.48% |
| Rex Grossman |
|
84 | 41.79% |
| Donovan McNabb |
|
18 | 8.96% |
| Jake Locker |
|
16 | 7.96% |
| Andrew Luck |
|
10 | 4.98% |
| Ryan Mallett |
|
12 | 5.97% |
| Cam Newton |
|
15 | 7.46% |
| Some Other QB Out of College |
|
9 | 4.48% |
| Some Other QB in the NFL |
|
30 | 14.93% |
| Voters: 201. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#27 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Who Will Be The Redskins 2011 Opening Day Starting QB?
Quote:
If we prorate Grossman's fumbles as well, you have an additional 21 of those. If he loses just ten of the 21, he's now personally responsible for 31 turnovers on the season. Then when you consider that even the successful passes come with high variance, you have a player who is comfortably below replacement. It may not be the worst QB situation in the NFL, but 16 games of Grossman would be one of the three worst QB situations in the NFL, in any year. Even an 81.1 passer rating can't support a guy who turns it over 31 times. That's only "production" in the "he managed to start sixteen games" sense. Which was a given in the exercise. As to your rookie assertion: I doubt a BAD prospect (Max Hall, for example) produces a 81.1 QB rating with 30 or fewer turnovers in his first year, but I think a promising rookie would be more productive than prorated Rex Grossman.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|