Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin
If that is the question put to this arbiter - and the only question - the arbiter would dismiss the matter as it is not within the jurisdiction granted him under the current CBA.
He may very well issue a decision saying that the Skins/Cowboys actions were not in violation of the 2006 CBA but that the modifications made to the 2012 and 2013 salary cap are both permitted under the current/governing CBA and were properly imposed under the procedures set forth in that CBA.
|
Why would, why do people think, and why on earth would it be allowed for the league to apply the current CBA rules to an issue that occurred under the old CBA?
I'm sorry this is where I see wrong doing also. If it was not in the old CBA shame on you change the rules so it doesn't happen again. You can't make a new CBA with a rule for this issue then go back to something that occurred 2yrs ago and apply a current rule/punishment to an issue that didn't occurr under it. IF and I'm saying IF this is what occurred it really leaves the league looking more idiotic then I thought it was before.
IF this is the case then DS definitely needs to take this to the courts.