![]() |
|
|||||||
| Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
|
Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer?
Quote:
More on the semantics: The word attack is defined as: "to set upon with violent force" attack - definition of attack by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia., verb tr. definition 1 I think dropping nuclear bombs on an industrial city constitutes an attack. period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer?
As FD said responded is a far more appropriate word than attack.
And they were begging for it......it was justified and a much better alternative to invasion. You make it sound like we snuck up on them and whacked them from behind while they were innocently arranging flowers. Thats not what happened. They kicked us in the balls when we werent looking and we responded by beating the tar out of them.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: North Korea: Threat or Blackmailer?
Quote:
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|