Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Secondary is a Primary

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2013, 04:16 PM   #1
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Secondary is a Primary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucket View Post
So, defending our NFC East crown isn't important.. We are still developing rookies and throwing them out week 1 to "develop"

I think it's more important to start the best players and allow the younger ones to build confidence in to a starting role. You throw Amerson out early and he gets burned and loses confidence in his ability and it could get worse. Remember, this guy is coming off his worse season on the college level.
So we should have sat RGIII last year and went with Grossman?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2013, 04:33 PM   #2
Bucket
Playmaker
 
Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
Re: Secondary is a Primary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
So we should have sat RGIII last year and went with Grossman?
Was Grossman the best player? Oh, you were trying to be funny with sarcasm and failed with reading comprehension..

Gotcha
__________________
I need something to cheer about
Redskin Fan since '88
Be friends on Twitter! @thecasualhero
Bucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2013, 10:48 AM   #3
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Secondary is a Primary

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bucket View Post
Was Grossman the best player? Oh, you were trying to be funny with sarcasm and failed with reading comprehension..

Gotcha
Speaking of Rex, I vote to cut him and sign Tebow as #3QB and gimmick player. Let him take a few of Robert's hits.

Seriously, on option plays, he could actually do some damage in our offense alongside Griffin.

True, Rex COULD actually guide us to a few wins, especially with our upgraded defense, but if we lose Griffin and Cousins...we're in trouble no matter who the #3 is. The chances of losing both of those guys is not big though, so why not have a #3 QB who can actually contribute weekly AND would be a perfect fit for the new offense, unlike Rex.

Wouldn't that be crazy...Rex wins the SB for us after Griffin and Cousins get us there?
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.16721 seconds with 11 queries