![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Eagles ink McCants?
again cooley fills his role, you dont need speed if you only have 10 yards to work in, if you want a second, maybe royal, TEs fit his role, cause thats basically what mccants was (minus the blocking)... i don't know why there's this insistance that it HAS to be a WR thats 6'+ and TEs don't count. The arguement you're making is kinda vague and the answer you're looking for isn't well defined.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: Eagles ink McCants?
[QUOTE=That Guy]i don't know why there's this insistance that it HAS to be a WR thats 6'+ and TEs don't count. QUOTE]
I think that the opportunity to win some "jump balls" is an important one... I don't see many TE's not named Gonzalez thriving in that situation, maybe I'm wrong... Who's our tallest receiver right now? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Eagles ink McCants?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|