![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
|
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
Glad to know that. I see you talked to Shanahan already and know why it was done. Good job. You should tell some others they won't be battling for the 6th WR or make the team since they won't make the cut. Hoping you're right and we are just fine at WR though. I actually like the receivers we have if they will be consistent. I think they have the talent and Stallworth is a veteran presence.
Last edited by Sonny9TD; 06-13-2013 at 12:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
|
Re: Redskins "Sign" Running Back (Redskins News and Notes Version 5.0)
I believe I said this was a good move initially and that Stallworth was a veteran presence. He was stating a declarative that me saying this was a good move to have them come in was wrong and we needed no help. How does he know we need no help? Sounds like he was just trying to be chitty actually. I will respond in kind. I don't come here and disagree with people and have an attitude. I only respond that way to those who do it to me. Manners go a long way. He knows how he meant it. He didn't tell anyone else that who liked the move. Maybe it was a bad idea bringing them on but that isn't why he said it..
Last edited by Sonny9TD; 06-13-2013 at 01:07 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|