![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Redskins News & Notes Chapter 6
Quote:
redskins = broke = cannot sign a big, long-term deal. now, i'm not sure they would if they could right now due to the injuries, which is what the article is saying, but that whole point is (s)moot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Redskins News & Notes Chapter 6
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Redskins News & Notes Chapter 6
only if you want to give him a backloaded/high bonus vinny type contract, which we've been steering away from lately.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Redskins News & Notes Chapter 6
Not at all. You only need to have the first year with a lower number. A lot of the contracts tend to have a lower first year salary anyways due to bonus money being paid early, even from Shanny and Allen. Look at Garcons contract. 2.1 mil base salary last year with a cap hit of 4.7 mil, 5.6 mil base salary this year with a cap hit of 8.2 mil. Most teams do it that way. They escalate the annual salary so that if they cut the player before they finish the contract, they are paying out less than if they had the annual salary stayed the same through every year.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|