Around the NFL 2013 Offseason (Version 5150)

[Lotus]

Brady has won Super Bowls with rather crappy receivers before. This does not mean that he will again - but it also means we should be cautious in declaring the demise of the Pats for receiver reasons alone.

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by Lotus

.... but it also means we should be cautious in declaring the demise of the Pats for receiver reasons alone.

Nah, **** it! Grab the pitchforks and burning brands! Burn the Franchise!

[SirLK26]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

Nah, **** it! Grab the pitchforks and burning brands! Burn the Franchise!

No, please don't do that! Then the Patriot's bandwagon fans would have to find another team, and some of them just might chose the Redskins.

I know the Patriots have some loyal fans, but for some reason, it seems like they have more bandwagon fans than any other team. Maybe it's just me.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SirLK26

No, please don't do that! Then the Patriot's bandwagon fans would have to find another team, and some of them just might chose the Redskins.

I know the Patriots have some loyal fans, but for some reason, it seems like they have more bandwagon fans than any other team. Maybe it's just me.

Oh come on, Pats fans are not bandwagon fans, they're just Red Sox fans who need to pass the time after baseball season is over.

[NYCskinfan82]

[QUOTE=SirLK26;1013221]No, please don't do that! Then the Patriot's bandwagon fans would have to find another team, and some of them just might chose the Redskins.

I know the Patriots have some loyal fans, but for some reason, it seems like they have more bandwagon fans than any other team. Maybe it's just me.[/QUOTE]

It's not just you, It looks that way to me to.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Brady has won Super Bowls with rather crappy receivers before. This does not mean that he will again - but it also means we should be cautious in declaring the demise of the Pats for receiver reasons alone.

Agreed. For years Brady threw to a bunch of joe schmoes and had success. I won't believe they are heading downhill until it happens.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Brady has won Super Bowls with rather crappy receivers before. This does not mean that he will again - but it also means we should be cautious in declaring the demise of the Pats for receiver reasons alone.

He was younger and had a far better defense than what they have now. Brady was 27 years old when his best receiver was Reche Caldwell.

While I don't think it is all gloom and doom for N.E., I don't think they will be the juggernaut they once were. But I am sure they'll find a way to win. I do find it puzzling that with all of the resources they've had (especially their draft picks), they've not given Brady any weapons (other than Gronk).

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

He was younger and had a far better defense than what they have now. Brady was 27 years old when his best receiver was Reche Caldwell.

While I don't think it is all gloom and doom for N.E., I don't think they will be the juggernaut they once were. But I am sure they'll find a way to win. I do find it puzzling that with all of the resources they've had (especially their draft picks), they've not given Brady any weapons (other than Gronk).

It seems they gave Hernandez a weapon.