Two major concerns

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. T.O. is in a league all by himself, he's more than just a big receiver. So it's not like us having McCants would be the same as having TO. Before him, Philly's "big" receiver was Pinkston. True, he had a good year in 2002, but I would say that the Eagles pretty much won in spite of him. Plax has yet to play a regular season game with the Giants, so you can't already say that they are successful with him. And Key has just played one season with the Cowboys, a season in which they finished 6-10. Plus we're don't stop big receivers with big receivers of our own, we stop them with big (and talented) defensive backs. Enter Shawn Springs and Carlos Rogers

We don't stop big WRs with WRs ? I think that's a given, but we aren't matching the defensive perfomance of our team with a strong effective offense, especially the passing game. What would you point to as the main reason for our inability to score last year?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by SUNRA

We don't stop big WRs with WRs ? I think that's a given, but we aren't matching the defensive perfomance of our team with a strong effective offense, especially the passing game. What would you point to as the main reason for our inability to score last year?

we had gardner, cooley, royal, and mccants, so our inability to score had nothing to do with height.

Why not wait till week 3 and see how its going, spinning in these circles of hate for weeks can't be healthy the team will prove whether it matters, but the pats have won small, the skins in the past have won small and there's tons of other examples out there.

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by That Guy

we had gardner, cooley, royal, and mccants, so our inability to score had nothing to do with height.

Why not wait till week 3 and see how its going, spinning in these circles of hate for weeks can't be healthy the team will prove whether it matters, but the pats have won small, the skins in the past have won small and there's tons of other examples out there.

Spinning in circles of hate for weeks? It's called a point of view. If you don't agree with it, fine. If it takes you until week 3 to finally disgest the garbage you call an offense, just watch how many points the offense averages and why the they continue to make the same mistakes like not scoring more than 20 points. Different names, the same shame.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by SUNRA

We don't stop big WRs with WRs ? I think that's a given, but we aren't matching the defensive perfomance of our team with a strong effective offense, especially the passing game. What would you point to as the main reason for our inability to score last year?

I don't want to put words in your mouth, but would it be right to say that you would have a preferred an receiving core of say Gardner, McCants and Muhsin Muhammad over Moss, Patten, and Thrash? Because of the height advantage they have.

I think there are many factors that contributed to our inability to score last year-poor clock management, costly penalties in or near the red zone, receivers dropping passes, receivers not getting separation, bad decisions by the QBs, etc.

What I think Moss and Patten give us that we didn't necessarily have last year are two sure-handed recievers who can make plays after the catch. I don't disagree with your notion that a big receiver helps in certain situations, but as been mentioned we have Cooley, Royal, even Koz and Sellers.

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I don't want to put words in your mouth, but would it be right to say that you would have a preferred an receiving core of say Gardner, McCants and Muhsin Muhammad over Moss, Patten, and Thrash? Because of the height advantage they have.

I think there are many factors that contributed to our inability to score last year-poor clock management, costly penalties in or near the red zone, receivers dropping passes, receivers not getting separation, bad decisions by the QBs, etc.

What I think Moss and Patten give us that we didn't necessarily have last year are two sure-handed recievers who can make plays after the catch. I don't disagree with your notion that a big receiver helps in certain situations, but as been mentioned we have Cooley, Royal, even Koz and Sellers.

No, I think you missed my point. What I said was that if Gardner and McCants were not effective, then go get a free-agent or rookie to replace them in size to balance the offense more. Gibbs wasted several roster spots that could have been a better match for his offense other than Dyson. There were many rookies in the combine that could have been picked up. I'm watching the game against the Ravens on NFL Network, and it is frustrating to see little ass Antonio Brown dropping balls all over the place. I think Cooley is the best option we have, Royal doesn't stay healthy, and Sellers is not being used enough in Gibbs offensive package.

My ideal receivers would have been Santana Moss, Mike Williams or Braylon Edwards, James Thrash, Jimmy Farris, 6'4, 235 Vincent Jackson. Why in the hell did they cut a guy that caught 2 TDS in his time to shine?