Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Debating with the enemy

Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here.


Trayvon Martin Case

Debating with the enemy


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-09-2013, 12:27 PM   #1
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Trayvon Martin Case

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Ignoring for the moment your generic and consistent assumptons and mischaracterizations of the facts and evidence ... You honestly believe a "not guilty" verdict means the law "side[d] with Zimm"? Would mean Zimm's actions were "justified"? Where do you get that sh**? A not guilty finding says neither and you should damn well get that straight.All a not guilty finding says is - "The State can't prove beyond a reasonable doubt Zimm is guilty of the crime that the State has alleged he committed." Nothing, absolutely nothing, more than that. The same standard would apply to Martin if the roles were reversed. I hope to God it will always be applicable to those accused of crimes.

A finding that the facts don't meet lawfully required burden of proof is a damn far sight removed from an affirmatively "siding" with Zimm or affirmatively saying he was "justified".

Is that really so hard a concept to grasp?

I weep for the rule of law. Pitchforks and torches all around.
I weep for the rule of law and history of injustice throughout this country as well.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 07-09-2013, 12:29 PM   #2
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: Trayvon Martin Case

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
I weep for the rule of law and history of injustice throughout this country as well.
So, to remedy the past injustices resulting from people ignoring the rule of law, we should ignore it in this case as well?
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline  
Old 07-09-2013, 12:31 PM   #3
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Trayvon Martin Case

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
So, to remedy the past injustices resulting from people ignoring the rule of law, we should ignore it in this case as well?
No, lets start by getting this one right. Zimmerman Guilty
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 07-09-2013, 12:33 PM   #4
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: Trayvon Martin Case

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
No, lets start by getting this one right. Zimmerman Guilty
<point_laugh>

RedskinRat is offline  
Old 07-09-2013, 12:41 PM   #5
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: Trayvon Martin Case

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
No, lets start by getting this one right. Zimmerman Guilty
A verdict you decided on long before the trial started. You're mind has been closed to any alternative since the first report that "gun-toting white guy shoots little black kid in hoodie while he was eating skittles".
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.89787 seconds with 11 queries