|
Re: Clinton Portis sues NFL over concussions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by over the mountain
Portis was on the radio yesterday and discussed the lawsuit. He said he didnt know the specific claims/arguments of the suit but he did say the following:
1) he didnt know what a concussion was (dont really buy that personally)
2) he didnt know what the diagnosis of a concussion was (I buy that to a degree)
3) when he had a head hit/injury, he was told to shake the cobwebs off and go back out there (I buy this.)
I could def see the medical staff down playing concussions and turning a blind eye to diagnosing them. Especially before a few years ago.
Even last year after all the new rules on mandatory concussion testing, you still saw mike vick laying on the field, fletcher calling for medical staff, then medical staff not administering the mandatory concussion test and saying he had to get grass out of his helmet and sent him back out there.
joe - interesting case that might be similar to the nfl concussion suit. I am sure you have read it before. I dont know the name offhand (______ v. CSK et al) but it was out of baltimore where a railroad worker sued for damages for injuries and disabilities related to walking on train tracks over many years. I think the employer argued, in part, assumption of risk. COA found in favor of the employee.
|
CSX Transp., Inc. v. Pitts, 203 Md. App. 343 (2013). I had not read it and did just a cursory review of the opinion. I didn't see any discussion on assumption of the risk - questions as to Fed preemption, notice and damage issues. Maybe I missed it.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
|