Five-year-old boy accidentally shoots, kills sister

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

What part of that article states that the shooter is a member of the NRA is in any way adhering to NRA policies?

Where did I say he was a member of the NRA ? The NRA does believe that you should be allowed to carry a loaded firearm on you at all times , correct ?Texas believes in it also ,and if you read the article you will see the man was standing out front and just waving the gun around .Thank God that his second amendment rights were protected though .

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Where did I say he was a member of the NRA ? The NRA does believe that you should be allowed to carry a loaded firearm on you at all times , correct ?Texas believes in it also ,and if you read the article you will see the man was standing out front and just waving the gun around .Thank God that his second amendment rights were protected though .

Somebody doesn't know that brandishing is illegal. And stunts like that, for example Joe Biden's shotgun advice, are discouraged by gun safety classes, including those run by the NRA.

Let alone the shooting. Sure, let's support gun control so ONLY criminals and nuts have them.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Where did I say he was a member of the NRA ? The NRA does believe that you should be allowed to carry a loaded firearm on you at all times , correct ?Texas believes in it also ,and if you read the article you will see the man was standing out front and just waving the gun around .Thank God that his second amendment rights were protected though .

The NRA believes that law abidiing citizens should be allowed to carry a firearm and in gun safty.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by firstdown

The NRA believes that law abidiing citizens should be allowed to carry a firearm and in gun safety.

Until the foresaid "law abiding citizens" shoot or kill someone ,then the NRA calls them nuts or mentally defective .

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Until the foresaid "law abiding citizens" shoot or kill someone ,then the NRA calls them nuts or mentally defective .

Most people that kill are nuts. Just like anyone using anything as a weapon to kill.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by firstdown

Most people that kill are nuts. Just like anyone using anything as a weapon to kill.

No the NRA doesn't see it that way ,your not a not till you kill .Maybe some better or even some more background checks would help ,they sure couldn't hurt .

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Giantone

No the NRA doesn't see it that way ,your not a not till you kill .Maybe some better or even some more background checks would help ,they sure couldn't hurt .

Pretty sure most gun owners would call Joe Biden nuts. So there you go.

Another logic fail on your part, giantone. Of course, everybody sane would call that shooters nuts. He's no longer "law abiding" as you put it, now is he?

So what are you trying to say, in response to calling only the shooter nuts, that all gun owners should be considered nuts until proven otherwise?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

Pretty sure most gun owners would call Joe Biden nuts. So there you go.

Another logic fail on your part, giantone.

Only in your very small world .

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Giantone

No the NRA doesn't see it that way ,your not a not till you kill .Maybe some better or even some more background checks would help ,they sure couldn't hurt .

I personally don't have a problem with having a back ground checks for all gun purchases but I also don't think having them will stop a person who wants a gun from finding one illegally. The problem as I see it if we started doing back ground checks on all purchases and as I say it does not work then they will want other limitations put into place. So on and so on.