![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
I've asked this a few times but I don't think I've seen a clear answer.
What exactly has Ramsey done to deserve to be the unquestioned starter?? Why are people soooo emotionally attached to this guy?? It has to be an emotional attachment, that's the only way I can see why people are so supportive of a QB who's been so inconsistent. It has to be an emotional attachment when people are so eager to overlook his interceptions and inconsistent play. I don't get it. Ramsey doesn't look like the answer right now, and in all likelihood Brunell is just a stopgap until Campbell is hopefully ready to take the job next year. But people are acting like we're benching Manning or Favre. We're benching a young QB who hasn't proven anything except that he's still an inconsistent QB that makes too many mental errors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
I would prefer a player who is inconsistent to one who is consistently bad. 70 yards in 2 and a half quarters of football is miserable. It is like watching paint dry when Brunell drops back. I have no faith in him. His best days are behind him. You can't win football games by not taking risks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
I agree 100%. My only emotional attachment is to Joe Gibbs & the redskins as a whole. As for the current players...I want the one's on the field that Joe Gibbs and Greg Williams think give us the best chance of winning.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
Ramsey salvaged the rest of last season. Gibbs was too late to try and get a winning record, but Ramsey sparked what little offense we had and started winning some games. he prevented an obscene losing record we were heading to with Brunell, and ended the season with hope. he proved he could score with what he had (unlike Brunell) and thats what got Ramsey the (19 minute) start this season and all the offseason reps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 54
Posts: 960
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Facts are Ramsey threw a pick on his second pass and fumbled twice. He has known he was the starter since last season and that's how he comes out of the gate? Bench him, I agree with Coach Gibbs that we need someone to establish themselves at qb. Its not that hard, even Kyle Orton was completing passes and holding onto the ball, Ramsey just looks shaky in the pocket and you can't have that.
Brunell didn't impress, I'd say Ramsey lost the job more than Brunell won it. But Ramsey is done in DC, his confidence is shot and he doesn't look comfortable on the field. I look for Brunell to have another big day against Big D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brazil, IN
Age: 55
Posts: 883
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
I guess.
This just sounds too much like last year. Although I question Ramsey, I was not impressed with Brunell play Sunday. So when Brunell messes up does he get yanked quick? Brunell had 8 games last year and Ramsey only had one half? I dont agree with that. How will Ramsey play when he gets back in is another question. Ramsey should of at least had 3 games to prove himself or not.
__________________
HTTR! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 219
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
Again, I'm not emotionally attached to Ramsey. I AM emotionally attached to winning (though it's getting harder to remember what that was like) and I feel Ramsey gives us the best chance to do so for this season. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
I'd start Campbell, but I'm just a Homer fan, that's why I'll defer to Coach Gibbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Reisterstown, MD
Age: 64
Posts: 141
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Memphis,
Gheez Donovan McNabbb threw an interception in the first quarter last night and I didn't see Andy Reid giving him the hook. I also see Favre throwing interceptions occasionally too. Fact of the matter is every QB is going to throw an interception but that doesn't mean they immediately get benched. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
I undoubtedly think Gibbs is great and has done more for this team than anyone else in the history of the franchise. However, I am not, nor will I ever be, the type to drink the Kool-Aid and blindly follow someone no matter who they are or how great I think they are. I truly think that despite what we saw of Brunell all last season, people are drinking the Kool-Aid and are placing too much trust in Gibbs. Yeah, for me it is emotional. Anyone who claims to be unemotional about the Redskins is either 1). a liar, 2). not thinking this talk of being "emotional" through, or 3). maybe doesn't have the same feelings about the Redskins that I have. I love my Skins. I love the Redskins more than just about anything else (my girlfriend and soon-to-be fiance tops them). I get passionate about the Redskins. I like Ramsey not for who he is, but for what I think he could do for this franchise if given AN ENTIRE season and a teaspoon of confidence. Trust me, if I thought Ramsey would kill our team, I'd be putting a bounty on his head. So yeah, I'm emotion in support of Ramsey, because I think Ramsey's the best we've got and I'd like to see a few wins. PS- Matty, I'm also trying to pin down your position. In some posts you seem to say that the Brunell-Ramsey debate isn't clear cut and in other posts you seem to say that it was a no brainer and Brunell was definately the way to go. Would you care to clarify your statements/opinions? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 219
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Don't confuse the questioning of Joe's decision with everyone being emotionally attached to Ramsey. My biggest concern is how unsettled things are at the QB position. I do think Ramsey gives us the best chance to win. I also think that Brunell has shown me nothing to justify giving him the starter's job. In fact, just the opposite, he's shown me a lot of reasons why he should not have the job. And, finally, Campbell is nothing but a big question mark right now.
Forgive me for being just a tad bit troubled with this scenario. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
Agreed, I am not so much a Ramsey fan [although I do like the kid and think he's tough, and a class act] as much as I want what's best for the team to win, and from every scenerio I look at it's Ramsey over Brunell, the only other problem I have is even if it turns out that Ramsey isn't the QB to lead us, I still feel under the circumstances and Brunells track record with us so far, he has been unfairly mistreated by Gibbs. Perhaps if some of us put our selves in Ramsey's shoes and take a look at what Gibbs did for Brunell last season, then to be told your my guy only to be yanked after 19 minutes for a guy who played the position last season for 9 games worse than anyone you have ever seen, you to may feel just a tad bit slighted, I would be surprised if Ramsey didn't ask for a trade, and wouldn't blame him one bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,340
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
Did somehow completing less than half of his throws and gaining 5 yards per attempt last year win him the starting job? Did the fact that he went right back to that 5 yard per attempt average last week do it? If you compare the numbers of what the two have done in the same system, it's not even close.
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
Last edited by illdefined; 09-14-2005 at 06:02 PM. Reason: terrible grammar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 49
Posts: 1,340
|
Re: Do you support Gibbs' decision to start Brunell? (Merged)
Quote:
I just can't get the 2004 comparison out of my head: Brunell 3-6: 9 games, 118 of 237 (49%), 1194 yards, 7 TD/6 INT, 63.9 rating Ramsey 3-4: 7 games, 169 of 272 (62%), 1451 yards, 10 TD/11 INT, 74.8 rating Hey, I hope I'm wrong. I hope I eat crow. But I just don't put that much stock in preseason, and I just don't have any faith in Brunell.
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!" |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|