The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by GoSkins!

I don't understand what is so mysterious about "don't turn the ball over"???

Also phrased:
"We have to protect the ball"
"Turn overs lose games"
"Our guys know how the odds go down for winning when you turn the ball over once, and twice..."
"We have hammered on these guys that we cant turn the ball over. We may have to resort to something other than words"

Ramsey throws a good ball, but he has been looking more like Jeff George than Tom Brady. If you turn the ball over, you had better throw more TDs than ints AND fumbles. I agree that he deserved more time, but three drives and he loses the ball three times? That is ridiculous.

Guys, if Ramsey were to start against Dallas after what he did against the Bears, Parcells would blitz him all night and we may not have a Ramsey by the end of the game.

the thing is they BOTH turned it over a lot last year :/ It just seems weird how loyal he seems to be to brunell specificly, but the strange part is how he declared ramsey his undisputed starter for so long (when he absolutely didn't have to) and then flipped so suddenly (we all knew/know he loves brunell too much, but most thought he'd give ramsey more than 19 minutes to see what he could do).

Radio's been talking about it all day, lots of people are upset, not so much over ramsey as much as over the sudden change (though somewhat expected i guess). I'm just kinda bummed cause i don't see brunell leading us up and onwards... I had no gaurantees ramsey could do that either, but it seemed more likely.

We'll see how brunell does, but what happens if he stinks it up and throws 2ints in 20 minutes? campbell? back to ramsey? my guess is gibbs would just leave him in, and that's really what's sorta chapping my ass