The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

[jgalecpa]

While It is absolutely true that Brunell had an overall lower QB rating last year than PR (74.8 vs 63.0), the turnover stat is way off balance.

PR threw only 14.77% more passes than MB (272 vs 237), but had 83.33% more INT's.

See: http://www.nfl.com/teams/stats/WAS/2004/regular

A mediocre QB sure aint going to win you many games, but he can lose them very quickly.

J

[illdefined]

Originally Posted by jgalecpa

While It is absolutely true that Brunell had an overall lower QB rating last year than PR (74.8 vs 63.0), the turnover stat is way off balance.

PR threw only 14.77% more passes than MB (272 vs 237), but had 83.33% more INT's.

See: http://www.nfl.com/teams/stats/WAS/2004/regular

A mediocre QB sure aint going to win you many games, but he can lose them very quickly.

J

lose games?? while you were looking at those stats, how did you miss that Brunell was the one with the least points and all the L's.

INTs can sometimes be a sideffect of POINTS, something Ramsey got more of and above turnovers, is ultimately the one stat that really determines WINS.

[jgalecpa]

Originally Posted by illdefined

lose games?? while you were looking at those stats, how did you miss that Brunell was the one with the least points and all the L's.

INTs can sometimes be a sideffect of POINTS, something Ramsey got more of and above turnovers, is ultimately the one stat that really determines WINS.

The TD % is not nearly as skewed as the INT %.

The TD % for PR is 3.7% and 3.0% for MB. Not that big a diff., compared to INT's

[illdefined]

Originally Posted by jgalecpa

The TD % is not nearly as skewed as the INT %.

The TD % for PR is 3.7% and 3.0% for MB. Not that big a diff., compared to INT's

whats the W/L%?

[jgalecpa]

Originally Posted by illdefined

whats the W/L%?

Actually, the Skins don't list W-L by QB, since there are about 50 other players that impact that as well.

[illdefined]

Originally Posted by jgalecpa

Actually, the Skins don't list W-L by QB, since there are about 50 other players that impact that as well.

right that makes sense, but there weren't any major personnel changes along with with Brunell/Ramsey switch were there? Janson was still out, and our WRs were the same.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by jgalecpa

The TD % is not nearly as skewed as the INT %.

The TD % for PR is 3.7% and 3.0% for MB. Not that big a diff., compared to INT's

thats still 23.3%, i'd say thats a huge difference.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by jgalecpa

While It is absolutely true that Brunell had an overall lower QB rating last year than PR (74.8 vs 63.0), the turnover stat is way off balance.

PR threw only 14.77% more passes than MB (272 vs 237), but had 83.33% more INT's.

See: http://www.nfl.com/teams/stats/WAS/2004/regular

A mediocre QB sure aint going to win you many games, but he can lose them very quickly.

J

you're forgetting brunells fumbles including ones returned for touchdowns. meaure TOs, not just ints. you also forgot to mention ramsey had 42.8% more TDs.