Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2005, 11:03 AM   #1
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
Re: The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgalecpa
While It is absolutely true that Brunell had an overall lower QB rating last year than PR (74.8 vs 63.0), the turnover stat is way off balance.

PR threw only 14.77% more passes than MB (272 vs 237), but had 83.33% more INT's.

See: http://www.nfl.com/teams/stats/WAS/2004/regular

A mediocre QB sure aint going to win you many games, but he can lose them very quickly.

J
lose games?? while you were looking at those stats, how did you miss that Brunell was the one with the least points and all the L's.

INTs can sometimes be a sideffect of POINTS, something Ramsey got more of and above turnovers, is ultimately the one stat that really determines WINS.
illdefined is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:16 AM   #2
jgalecpa
Special Teams
 
jgalecpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 458
Re: The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
lose games?? while you were looking at those stats, how did you miss that Brunell was the one with the least points and all the L's.

INTs can sometimes be a sideffect of POINTS, something Ramsey got more of and above turnovers, is ultimately the one stat that really determines WINS.
The TD % is not nearly as skewed as the INT %.

The TD % for PR is 3.7% and 3.0% for MB. Not that big a diff., compared to INT's
jgalecpa is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:18 AM   #3
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
Re: The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgalecpa
The TD % is not nearly as skewed as the INT %.

The TD % for PR is 3.7% and 3.0% for MB. Not that big a diff., compared to INT's
whats the W/L%?
illdefined is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:49 AM   #4
jgalecpa
Special Teams
 
jgalecpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 458
Re: The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
whats the W/L%?
Actually, the Skins don't list W-L by QB, since there are about 50 other players that impact that as well.
jgalecpa is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 12:05 PM   #5
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
Re: The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgalecpa
Actually, the Skins don't list W-L by QB, since there are about 50 other players that impact that as well.
right that makes sense, but there weren't any major personnel changes along with with Brunell/Ramsey switch were there? Janson was still out, and our WRs were the same.
illdefined is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 03:32 PM   #6
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: The Gibbs Hypocrisy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgalecpa
The TD % is not nearly as skewed as the INT %.

The TD % for PR is 3.7% and 3.0% for MB. Not that big a diff., compared to INT's
thats still 23.3%, i'd say thats a huge difference.
That Guy is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.90140 seconds with 11 queries