![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,643
|
Re: 2014 draft prospects Early edition
Manziel is just too risky to take number one. I keep the guys they have at QB and take Clowney.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
|
Re: 2014 draft prospects Early edition
I've heard a few times now that the Skins might be looking to trade back into the 1st Round. link
But I haven't heard who those coveted targets are that they think could be taken in the 30-32 range. Have any of you heard? I do like the thought process that if you feel strongly about a prospect to lock them into the 5 year first round rookie contract as opposed to the 4 year rookie contract. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,100
|
Re: 2014 draft prospects Early edition
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: 2014 draft prospects Early edition
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
|
Re: 2014 draft prospects Early edition
CJ Mosely would make this defense a number one defense. We could then go secondary and d-line in free agency. Bring back Rak, Tapp , and Jackson. Don't forget Kerrigan and Jenkins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: 2014 draft prospects Early edition
Quote:
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: 2014 draft prospects Early edition
Quote:
The media's hyping Russell Wilson and his weekly 150-yard performances as proof a shorter QB can succeed, so now a wave of short QBs are going to take over the league. Sure. Bridgewater would be my choice if I were Houston. Clowney would be an easy pick to make and likely won't backfire but they aren't going anywhere without a QB. Having the #1 pick doesn't come around often, not even for Oakland and Cleveland, so they need to make it a franchise-changer. A QB is the best way to accomplish that. A defensive player, while valuable, usually doesn't "save" a team the way a franchise QB can.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|