![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
So Aldrick, Santanna, Hank... Wonder who stays and who goes.
I would say we keep six guys (all this could change barring injury), but I also see someone other than one of these three taking a spot at wr.
__________________
Just win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson
Quote:
Aldrick I'd argue is kind of redundant now as up to this point he was our poor mans Desean Jackson. However he's been having problems for a while now with inconsistency and while Jackson is capable of running a full route tree Robinson seems to be limited to go routes off play action. Of course you could also reframe it as giving Robinson a chance to learn from a pro bowler with a similar skill set so we'll see how that turns out. I think the coaches want to give Hankerson every chance to make the roster and be a major contributor and might even want to have him compete with Andre Roberts but at this point his saving grace will probably be the lack of size among our receiving corps. Even more so when you consider how fond Gruden was in Cinci of bigger receivers, even outside of AJ Green. Of course these days its not uncommon for coaches to favor the guys who do best in practice over the 'sexier' names among fans. James Thrash back in the day being the quintessential example.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|