![]() |
|
|||||||
| Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Pro-gun article
the 2nd amendment clearly states that its purpose is to provide a well armed militia ... the supreme court case defining militia as any male over 18 as potentially a militia member and thus has 2nd amendment rights and protections seems like a very far stretch.
also the gun laws in texas to allow open carry for rifles were put in place so that hunters could transport a rifle from their home, into their truck and then the woods to hunt without being arrested. it was never intended to allow guys to walk through walmart with AR-15s courting reaction. ^ my opinions are based off articles and synopsis i have read. i have never actually read the SCOTUS case re definition of militia or the Texas legislature hearing notes on intent. why do i continue to post in this thread??? |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|