![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Grade the Redskins free agent efforts so far | |||
| A |
|
21 | 23.33% |
| B |
|
60 | 66.67% |
| C |
|
8 | 8.89% |
| D |
|
0 | 0% |
| F |
|
1 | 1.11% |
| Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
|
Re: Offseason grade
I disagree as those are Super Bowl contenders. I think there's a time and place to "overpay" for free agents. That time is now for both those teams as their QB's are in the twilight of their careers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Offseason grade
Quote:
I find it interesting that Denver would spend so much money on defense, when they were beating soundly by Seattle's defensive line.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
|
Re: Offseason grade
But they managed to lure the centerpiece from the Redskins physically opposing line from 2013 - Will Montgomery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
|
Re: Offseason grade
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 822
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
Before I start I do not like the signing of DJax. He is a gifted athlete; he is also a locker room cancer. I think he will have a good year and then next year he will start to complain and he will be gone in 3 years.
I am grading on a curve and giving them a “B” because signing DJax gives them a dominate group. If everybody stays healthy, they should have the best receiving corps in the league. Depending on the draft this grade could slide up or down. We have added some depth but are still missing some Oline help. We still have questions in at middle linebacker and secondary. Hopefully last year’s draft stays healthy and can play some football. I could also see KC being shipped to the Browns for a 2nd round pick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
I have a feeling they're going to run a lot of defensive sets with a line consisting of Rak, Hatcher, Cofield, and Kerrigan. Personally, I feel this is going to be a ridiculous set up and hopefully will lead to tons of pressures/sacks.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,744
|
Quote:
That's just ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
I can only assume this guy is a complete idiot.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
DJax is going to kick ass this season. RG3 is going to love the deep ball, and Morris will have a career year.
At the end of the day, who cares about some stupid rankings some nobody grades it as. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
In terms of raw value per dollar spent, they probably deserve a C or D, but I'm okay with some inefficient spending if the team can improve itself at need positions. Given how inept that the pass rush by the DL was last year, and how much the receivers struggled to get open, and that they were able to retain all the players they wanted to, I'm willing to give a solid B.
If there was a way to fix all of those needs without inefficient free agent spending, I'd grade a little harder, but they really had to make some major changes and don't have a first round pick to bank on. Taking a pair of risks on Hatcher and Jackson while hoping for the best seems more reasonable than trying to take the same team into next year and just trying to survive.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
|
Brandon Moore, no more.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
Quote:
Report: Redskins cut suspended D-lineman Moore | Comcast SportsNet Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
F - they failed to address FS or RT which were the two biggest needs and positions I do not think you can plug-in a 2nd or 3rd round rookie to start right away.
Of course I love the idea of what D jax can bring to the field but i did not think we needed him .. at all. its like buying a spoiler for our banged up 1998 honda civic. biggest FA addition imo is a healthy RG3. if he is healthy, its lights out on our comp.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
Quote:
Putting Jackson on the field opens up the entire offense. It gives Morris more room to operate. It gives Reed the middle of the field, Jackson does things that will not show up in the stat sheet. Of course keeping him happy is another story. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Redskins free agent signings thread part II
Quote:
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|