Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2014, 01:11 PM   #1
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
80 for PG 1100 yards and 6 Tds

72 for DJ 1050 yards 5 tds

55 for Roberts 800 yards 2 tds

I think Reed leads the team in Tds (10)
If Jackson gets 72 catches his number should be higher from all the deep passes he will get, but I think Reed leads the team in TDs as well.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2014, 01:12 PM   #2
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: Redskins Sign DeSean Jackson

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
If Jackson gets 72 catches his number should be higher from all the deep passes he will get, but I think Reed leads the team in TDs as well.
yeah thats true ok, 72 for 1150? lol
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.44889 seconds with 11 queries