Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Debating with the enemy

Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here.


Pro-gun article

Debating with the enemy


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2014, 06:59 PM   #1
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,637
Re: Pro-gun article

__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline  
Old 04-17-2014, 07:05 PM   #2
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,637
Re: Pro-gun article

Five people wounded in accidental shootings at THREE different gun and knife shows | Mail Online


__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline  
Old 04-17-2014, 07:47 PM   #3
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
Re: Pro-gun article

Before reading the article, I am willing to bet that none of the people injured went stomping there feet to the government that there oughta be a law. Instead the people who were shot probably held the individuals who shot them responsible.

Now I will go read the article, and see if I am right

edit: read it, didn't really say but the more interesting thing is that this is from 20 Jan 2013.

G1 you really are a troll in these threads... Shame, cuz football wise your posts are decent.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 04-17-2014, 07:54 PM   #4
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,637
Re: Pro-gun article

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Before reading the article, I am willing to bet that none of the people injured went stomping there feet to the government that there oughta be a law. Instead the people who were shot probably held the individuals who shot them responsible.

Now I will go read the article, and see if I am right

edit: read it, didn't really say but the more interesting thing is that this is from 20 Jan 2013.

G1 you really are a troll in these threads... Shame, cuz football wise your posts are decent.

Not a troll , the voice of reason to a small group of very unreasonable posters.
As I have said before I respect your opinion but I disagree .
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 07:58 AM   #5
HailGreen28
Playmaker
 
HailGreen28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
Re: Pro-gun article

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
Glad there's signs that once in awhile you can think clearly. Though I think the poster maker didn't understand the subject matter any more than you do. This could be good. Broken clock, and all.

Re.the overall poster: So no blanket gun bans, gun restrictions, or gun taxes? Because you're not so stupid you're pissed at guns? Good.

Re.1: Mandatory safety programs? Particularly if the government pays for them, this is very good. From teaching kids NOT to play with guns, to youth and adult handling and shooting training, a one time course would be good. Maybe offer it in high school. The only tricky part is "mandatory". No permanent gun registration should be kept, just records that a person has taken the course, should be good for background checks. And the safety courses must not be restrictively priced high or scarce to find, like the shenanigans DC pulled here. Edit: You know what, still too vulnerable to government abuse, and tying classes to the right to bear arms is unconstitutional. Best thing to do would be to make it a one-time mandatory class in elementary school, and highschool, a requirement for graduation.

Re.2: Depends what you mean by "more thorough background checks". Enforcing existing laws better would be start.

Re.3: Depends of what the definitions of "negligence" laws, like simply having a gun that's not locked in a safe, are a no-go. Tougher penalties on brandishing, using guns like Joe Biden recommended, etc., criminal misuse of guns, would be good though.

So... glad to see some people coming around, I guess?

Last edited by HailGreen28; 04-19-2014 at 08:26 AM.
HailGreen28 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.51488 seconds with 11 queries